Passaggio 1
Ascolto cieco
Comprendi l’idea generale, il tema e le informazioni principali senza sottotitoli.
🎧 Pratica IELTS ascolto e parlato
0:00 / 0:00
Metodo di ascolto in cinque passaggi
Trasforma un contenuto di ascolto in input di inglese riutilizzabile
Non fermarti a un solo ascolto. Dividi lo stesso episodio in cinque passaggi: prima il senso generale, poi supporto linguistico, shadowing, dettato e infine un nuovo ascolto senza sottotitoli.
Passaggio 2
Sottotitoli in inglese
Chiarisci parole sconosciute e frasi difficili. Usa un dizionario e brevi appunti se necessario.
Passaggio 3
Shadowing
Ripeti frase per frase e imita pronuncia, ritmo, accento e intonazione.
Passaggio 4
Dettato
Scrivi alcune frasi chiave da ciò che senti per allenare forma e struttura.
Passaggio 5
Riascolto senza sottotitoli
Ascolta di nuovo senza supporto testuale e nota cosa ora risulta più facile e chiaro.
Dopo l’allenamento
Condividi e riformula
Condividi appunti, parole nuove o un concetto utile, poi racconta l’episodio con parole tue.
Passo successivo
Dall’intensivo all’estensivo
Riutilizza gli episodi studiati in modo intensivo come ascolto di sottofondo e aumenta il volume con materiale familiare.
Passaggio 1Passaggio 2Passaggio 3Passaggio 4Passaggio 5
📝 Trascrizione dialogo IELTS Speaking
I want to talk about criticism in public life. Good criticism can sharpen thinking. It can reveal weak points and suggest better ideas. But lately, online responses often do the opposite. Too frequently people rush to eviscerate an argument with a single harsh reply. That means they strip away nuance and leave nothing constructive. I have even seen commentators eviscerate a person’s reputation rather than address the idea. A recent, widely quoted survey claimed 60% of respondents said they prefer blunt feedback. And last year, a headline argued that 500 thought leaders were effectively deplatformed on one network. Those figures make the point, but they also distract from the real issue. The main problem is not numbers. It is tone. The best critics take time. They explain specific flaws. They offer alternatives and invite dialogue. Think of a teacher correcting a draft calmly, compared with a mob piling on in replies. To improve public debate we should pause before replying. We should ask clarifying questions. Schools could teach digital civility as part of citizenship classes. If we slow down, we may avoid needlessly trying to eviscerate every opposing view.
📝 📚 Domande pratica IELTS
1
What main concern does the speaker express about online criticism?
Risposta Sbagliata
Risposta Corretta:
A
Spiegazione:
Correct: The speaker repeatedly says online criticism 'eviscerates' arguments and reputations instead of being constructive. Option B is incorrect because although the speaker mentions statistics, they say numbers distract from the issue, not that statistics are the main concern. Option C is wrong; the speaker criticizes quick, rushed responses, not slowness. Option D is incorrect because the speaker complains about harsh criticism, not excessive praise.
2
Which statistic did the speaker mention from a recent survey?
Risposta Sbagliata
Risposta Corretta:
B
Spiegazione:
Correct: The passage states 'a recent, widely quoted survey claimed 60% of respondents said they prefer blunt feedback.' Option A, C, and D are plausible-sounding distractors but are not mentioned in the passage.
3
Which example does the speaker use to contrast helpful and harmful criticism?
Risposta Sbagliata
Risposta Corretta:
A
Spiegazione:
Correct: The speaker explicitly contrasts 'a teacher correcting a draft calmly' with 'a mob piling on in replies.' Options B, C, and D are related ideas but are not the example used in the passage.
4
Why does the speaker suggest pausing before replying online?
Risposta Sbagliata
Risposta Corretta:
A
Spiegazione:
Correct: The speaker recommends pausing so people do not 'needlessly try to eviscerate every opposing view.' Option B is incorrect; there is no mention of deferring to news outlets. Option C is opposite to the speaker's aims—going viral is not a goal discussed. Option D is not supported; the speaker focuses on tone and quality, not comment counts.
5
In this context, what is the best meaning of the word 'eviscerate' as used by the speaker?
Risposta Sbagliata
Risposta Corretta:
C
Spiegazione:
Correct: 'Eviscerate' is used to describe stripping away nuance or gutting an argument or reputation, meaning to destroy or remove essential parts. Option A is incorrect because it is the opposite. Option B is wrong; 'eviscerate' implies active attack, not ignoring. Option D is incorrect because careful editing is constructive, whereas 'eviscerate' is destructive in this usage.
6
What does the speaker imply about the 'best critics'?
Risposta Sbagliata
Risposta Corretta:
A
Spiegazione:
Correct: The speaker says 'The best critics take time. They explain specific flaws. They offer alternatives and invite dialogue.' Option B is unsupported; length of commentary is not mentioned. Option C is wrong because the speaker criticizes blunt feedback when it is destructive. Option D is incorrect; the speaker does not claim critics should avoid statistics.
7
Which institution does the speaker suggest could help improve public debate?
Risposta Sbagliata
Risposta Corretta:
A
Spiegazione:
Correct: The speaker explicitly says 'Schools could teach digital civility as part of citizenship classes.' Options B, C, and D are plausible-sounding but are not suggested in the passage.
Trasforma l'Ascolto in Parlato
Ottieni feedback istantaneo e pratica quotidiana nell'app LexiTalk.
Scarica l'App