第1回
字幕なしで聞く
字幕なしで大意、テーマ、主要な情報をつかみます。
🎧 IELTSリスニングスピーキング練習
0:00 / 0:00
5回リスニング法
1本のリスニング教材を再利用できる英語インプットに変える
1回聞いて終わりにしないでください。同じエピソードを5回に分けて、まず大意、次に言語面の確認、シャドーイング、ディクテーション、最後に字幕なしで聞き直します。
第2回
英語字幕を見る
知らない語や難しい文を確認します。必要なら辞書や短いメモを使います。
第3回
シャドーイング
1文ずつ繰り返し、発音、リズム、強勢、イントネーションをまねします。
第4回
ディクテーション
聞こえた内容から重要な文をいくつか書き取り、形と構造を鍛えます。
第5回
字幕なしで再聴
文字の助けなしで再度聞き、以前より分かる部分が増えたことを確認します。
トレーニング後
共有して言い換える
メモ、新出語、役立つ概念を共有し、その後で自分の言葉でエピソードを言い換えましょう。
次のステップ
精聴から多聴へ
集中的に学習したエピソードを後で流し聞きに回し、慣れた素材で聞く量を増やしましょう。
第1回第2回第3回第4回第5回
📝 IELTSスピーキングダイアログトランスクリプト
I want to talk about criticism in public life. Good criticism can sharpen thinking. It can reveal weak points and suggest better ideas. But lately, online responses often do the opposite. Too frequently people rush to eviscerate an argument with a single harsh reply. That means they strip away nuance and leave nothing constructive. I have even seen commentators eviscerate a person’s reputation rather than address the idea. A recent, widely quoted survey claimed 60% of respondents said they prefer blunt feedback. And last year, a headline argued that 500 thought leaders were effectively deplatformed on one network. Those figures make the point, but they also distract from the real issue. The main problem is not numbers. It is tone. The best critics take time. They explain specific flaws. They offer alternatives and invite dialogue. Think of a teacher correcting a draft calmly, compared with a mob piling on in replies. To improve public debate we should pause before replying. We should ask clarifying questions. Schools could teach digital civility as part of citizenship classes. If we slow down, we may avoid needlessly trying to eviscerate every opposing view.
📝 📚 IELTS練習問題
1
What main concern does the speaker express about online criticism?
不正解
正解:
A
説明:
Correct: The speaker repeatedly says online criticism 'eviscerates' arguments and reputations instead of being constructive. Option B is incorrect because although the speaker mentions statistics, they say numbers distract from the issue, not that statistics are the main concern. Option C is wrong; the speaker criticizes quick, rushed responses, not slowness. Option D is incorrect because the speaker complains about harsh criticism, not excessive praise.
2
Which statistic did the speaker mention from a recent survey?
不正解
正解:
B
説明:
Correct: The passage states 'a recent, widely quoted survey claimed 60% of respondents said they prefer blunt feedback.' Option A, C, and D are plausible-sounding distractors but are not mentioned in the passage.
3
Which example does the speaker use to contrast helpful and harmful criticism?
不正解
正解:
A
説明:
Correct: The speaker explicitly contrasts 'a teacher correcting a draft calmly' with 'a mob piling on in replies.' Options B, C, and D are related ideas but are not the example used in the passage.
4
Why does the speaker suggest pausing before replying online?
不正解
正解:
A
説明:
Correct: The speaker recommends pausing so people do not 'needlessly try to eviscerate every opposing view.' Option B is incorrect; there is no mention of deferring to news outlets. Option C is opposite to the speaker's aims—going viral is not a goal discussed. Option D is not supported; the speaker focuses on tone and quality, not comment counts.
5
In this context, what is the best meaning of the word 'eviscerate' as used by the speaker?
不正解
正解:
C
説明:
Correct: 'Eviscerate' is used to describe stripping away nuance or gutting an argument or reputation, meaning to destroy or remove essential parts. Option A is incorrect because it is the opposite. Option B is wrong; 'eviscerate' implies active attack, not ignoring. Option D is incorrect because careful editing is constructive, whereas 'eviscerate' is destructive in this usage.
6
What does the speaker imply about the 'best critics'?
不正解
正解:
A
説明:
Correct: The speaker says 'The best critics take time. They explain specific flaws. They offer alternatives and invite dialogue.' Option B is unsupported; length of commentary is not mentioned. Option C is wrong because the speaker criticizes blunt feedback when it is destructive. Option D is incorrect; the speaker does not claim critics should avoid statistics.
7
Which institution does the speaker suggest could help improve public debate?
不正解
正解:
A
説明:
Correct: The speaker explicitly says 'Schools could teach digital civility as part of citizenship classes.' Options B, C, and D are plausible-sounding but are not suggested in the passage.
リスニングをスピーキングに変換
LexiTalkアプリで即座のフィードバックと毎日の練習を取得。
アプリをダウンロード