第1回
字幕なしで聞く
字幕なしで大意、テーマ、主要な情報をつかみます。
🎧 IELTSリスニングスピーキング練習
0:00 / 0:00
5回リスニング法
1本のリスニング教材を再利用できる英語インプットに変える
1回聞いて終わりにしないでください。同じエピソードを5回に分けて、まず大意、次に言語面の確認、シャドーイング、ディクテーション、最後に字幕なしで聞き直します。
第2回
英語字幕を見る
知らない語や難しい文を確認します。必要なら辞書や短いメモを使います。
第3回
シャドーイング
1文ずつ繰り返し、発音、リズム、強勢、イントネーションをまねします。
第4回
ディクテーション
聞こえた内容から重要な文をいくつか書き取り、形と構造を鍛えます。
第5回
字幕なしで再聴
文字の助けなしで再度聞き、以前より分かる部分が増えたことを確認します。
トレーニング後
共有して言い換える
メモ、新出語、役立つ概念を共有し、その後で自分の言葉でエピソードを言い換えましょう。
次のステップ
精聴から多聴へ
集中的に学習したエピソードを後で流し聞きに回し、慣れた素材で聞く量を増やしましょう。
第1回第2回第3回第4回第5回
📝 IELTSスピーキングダイアログトランスクリプト
I'm thinking today about how societies handle public art and monuments. Some communities rush to act when a statue becomes controversial. Authorities will often swoop in and remove a piece overnight. A similar sudden swoop happened in one town when workers took down a figure without public consultation. People often talk about what values we should enshrine in law. Many argue that we must enshrine protection for historical objects, even if they offend some citizens. At the same time, blatant neglect of context is common. Sometimes there is blatant vandalism, or a blatant refusal to explain why a piece is kept. I remember a misshapen bronze figure in my city. The head looked misshapen after a questionable restoration. That statue was originally carved in 1872 by a local artist. It was reportedly replaced with a replica in 1999. A council meeting in 2015 supposedly confirmed its status. I do not think sudden action is always right. Hasty removals can ignore reasoned debate. Careful decisions help avoid a rash swoop and ensure we enshrine a considered history. Otherwise we risk keeping misshapen memories and celebrating blatant mistakes.
📝 📚 IELTS練習問題
1
What is the main subject of the speaker's talk?
不正解
正解:
B
説明:
The speaker discusses how societies handle public art and monuments, especially when controversy arises. Option A is too narrow (restoration), C focuses on the artist rather than the wider debate, and D focuses only on removal techniques, which is not the main point.
2
According to the speaker, what action did authorities sometimes take?
不正解
正解:
B
説明:
The passage states that authorities will often 'swoop in and remove a piece overnight.' Option A contradicts the idea of quick action, C misreads 'enshrine' as what authorities always do, and D is not mentioned at all.
3
Which adjective did the speaker use to describe the visible damage to a statue?
不正解
正解:
C
説明:
The speaker specifically describes a bronze figure as 'misshapen.' 'Elegant' and 'pristine' are opposite in meaning. 'Transparent' is unrelated to physical damage.
4
What can be inferred about the speaker's attitude to sudden removals of monuments?
不正解
正解:
C
説明:
The speaker criticizes 'hasty removals' and says careful decisions help avoid rash swoops, indicating opposition to sudden action. Option A contradicts this. B is incorrect because the speaker expresses an opinion. D is not suggested in the text.
5
Why does the speaker mention the idea to 'enshrine protection for historical objects'?
不正解
正解:
B
説明:
The speaker says many argue we must 'enshrine protection for historical objects,' meaning place protection into law to preserve heritage. A is unrelated, C misinterprets enshrine as rigid permanence beyond the speaker's point, and D takes the word literally rather than legally.
6
In this passage, the word 'blatant' most nearly means:
不正解
正解:
B
説明:
The speaker uses 'blatant' in contexts like 'blatant vandalism' and 'blatant refusal', where it means obvious or flagrant. 'Subtle' and 'accidental' are opposite in meaning, and 'legal' is unrelated.
7
Which specific year did the speaker say a replica replaced the original statue?
不正解
正解:
B
説明:
The speaker states the statue 'was reportedly replaced with a replica in 1999.' Option A is the year given for the original carving, C is the year mentioned for a council meeting, and D is not mentioned and is therefore incorrect.
リスニングをスピーキングに変換
LexiTalkアプリで即座のフィードバックと毎日の練習を取得。
アプリをダウンロード