第1回
字幕なしで聞く
字幕なしで大意、テーマ、主要な情報をつかみます。
🎧 上級英語オーディオ練習
0:00 / 0:00
5回リスニング法
1本のリスニング教材を再利用できる英語インプットに変える
1回聞いて終わりにしないでください。同じエピソードを5回に分けて、まず大意、次に言語面の確認、シャドーイング、ディクテーション、最後に字幕なしで聞き直します。
第2回
英語字幕を見る
知らない語や難しい文を確認します。必要なら辞書や短いメモを使います。
第3回
シャドーイング
1文ずつ繰り返し、発音、リズム、強勢、イントネーションをまねします。
第4回
ディクテーション
聞こえた内容から重要な文をいくつか書き取り、形と構造を鍛えます。
第5回
字幕なしで再聴
文字の助けなしで再度聞き、以前より分かる部分が増えたことを確認します。
トレーニング後
共有して言い換える
メモ、新出語、役立つ概念を共有し、その後で自分の言葉でエピソードを言い換えましょう。
次のステップ
精聴から多聴へ
集中的に学習したエピソードを後で流し聞きに回し、慣れた素材で聞く量を増やしましょう。
第1回第2回第3回第4回第5回
📝 上級英語ダイアログ
Urban deployments of environmental sensors are increasingly framed as technical solutions to policy problems. I will discuss one municipal program that illustrates social resistance and disciplinary choices. The city council chose a vendor with low-cost sensors. Some residents described the devices as stinky, not because of literal odor, but as shorthand for an offensive presence. Others used the descriptor stinky to mean poorly designed equipment that rusted and smelled when wet. Critics called the monitoring regime horrible, alleging intrusive surveillance and lack of consent. Some described the process as horrible because officials had not engaged in meaningful consultation. In response, researchers chose participatory methods to rebuild trust. A neighborhood activist chose to document failures with photographs and timelines. Those interventions reduced complaints and reframed the technology as accountable. The case suggests that technical efficacy alone does not determine acceptance. Perceptions of functionality, aesthetics and ethics converge. Policymakers should anticipate rhetorical reactions and remediate them. To ignore social vocabulary - the metaphors 'stinky' or 'horrible' that citizens use - is to misread public sentiment. Corrective choices require transparency, co-design and iterative evaluation.
📝 📚 上級練習問題
1
What action did the city council take regarding the sensor program?
不正解
正解:
A
説明:
The passage explicitly states that the city council chose a vendor with low-cost sensors. Options B, C and D contradict the stated action or introduce details not mentioned in the passage.
2
Why did some residents describe the devices as 'stinky' according to the speaker?
不正解
正解:
B
説明:
The speaker says residents described the devices as 'stinky', not because of literal odor, but as shorthand for an offensive presence. Option A is explicitly negated by the text. Options C and D are unrelated to the reason given.
3
Which phrase describes the critics' complaints about the monitoring regime?
不正解
正解:
A
説明:
The passage states critics called the regime 'horrible', alleging intrusive surveillance and lack of consent. Options B, C and D introduce causes that are not mentioned or are implausible relative to the text.
4
What methodological change did researchers adopt in response to criticism?
不正解
正解:
A
説明:
The passage explicitly notes researchers chose participatory methods to rebuild trust. Options B, C and D are not supported by the text and contradict the described response.
5
What effect did the interventions (researcher and activist actions) have?
不正解
正解:
A
説明:
The passage states that those interventions reduced complaints and reframed the technology as accountable. Options B, C and D contradict this stated outcome or introduce events not described.
6
In the passage, what is the best synonym for 'remediate' as used in 'remediate them'?
不正解
正解:
A
説明:
Within context, 'remediate them' refers to addressing or correcting rhetorical reactions and public concerns. 'Ignore permanently' is the opposite, while 'publicize' and 'measure quantitatively' do not capture the corrective sense implied.
7
What can be inferred about the speaker's view on technical efficacy and public acceptance?
不正解
正解:
A
説明:
The speaker explicitly suggests that 'technical efficacy alone does not determine acceptance' and that perceptions of functionality, aesthetics and ethics converge. Options B, C and D overstate or misstate the speaker's nuanced position and are not supported by the passage.
リスニングをスピーキングに変換
LexiTalkアプリで即座のフィードバックと毎日の練習を取得。
アプリをダウンロード