第1回
字幕なしで聞く
字幕なしで大意、テーマ、主要な情報をつかみます。
🎧 IELTSリスニングスピーキング練習
0:00 / 0:00
5回リスニング法
1本のリスニング教材を再利用できる英語インプットに変える
1回聞いて終わりにしないでください。同じエピソードを5回に分けて、まず大意、次に言語面の確認、シャドーイング、ディクテーション、最後に字幕なしで聞き直します。
第2回
英語字幕を見る
知らない語や難しい文を確認します。必要なら辞書や短いメモを使います。
第3回
シャドーイング
1文ずつ繰り返し、発音、リズム、強勢、イントネーションをまねします。
第4回
ディクテーション
聞こえた内容から重要な文をいくつか書き取り、形と構造を鍛えます。
第5回
字幕なしで再聴
文字の助けなしで再度聞き、以前より分かる部分が増えたことを確認します。
トレーニング後
共有して言い換える
メモ、新出語、役立つ概念を共有し、その後で自分の言葉でエピソードを言い換えましょう。
次のステップ
精聴から多聴へ
集中的に学習したエピソードを後で流し聞きに回し、慣れた素材で聞く量を増やしましょう。
第1回第2回第3回第4回第5回
📝 IELTSスピーキングダイアログトランスクリプト
I want to talk about whether universities should rescind honorary degrees and awards. Recently, students and alumni have called for institutions to rescind honours awarded to controversial figures. Some commentators argue that revoking an honour repairs a university's reputation. I am more cautious. I will give three reasons why institutions should think twice before they take back an award. First, fairness. People change over time and judging past behaviour is complicated. Second, precedent. Rescinding one award can set a precedent that invites constant review. Third, practical difficulty. Records are messy and legal fights can follow. I mention a couple of high-profile cases from around 2015 that grabbed headlines and prompted demands. That detail is interesting but not decisive. We should be wary of a chilling effect, where future decisions are made to avoid criticism rather than for academic merit. In short, I favour careful, case-by-case consideration. I do not suggest never rescinding. Nor do I suggest a rush to revoke honours to satisfy immediate public pressure. Institutions should weigh fairness, precedent, and practical consequences before they rescind an award.
📝 📚 IELTS練習問題
1
What is the main topic of the passage?
不正解
正解:
A
説明:
Correct: The speaker explicitly discusses whether universities should rescind honorary degrees. B is related but too general—the passage focuses on rescinding, not improving reputation generally. C is incorrect because the passage addresses taking awards back, not how they are granted. D is wrong; student protests are mentioned but legal procedures for protests are not discussed.
2
How many reasons does the speaker give for being cautious about rescinding awards?
不正解
正解:
C
説明:
Correct: The speaker lists three reasons: fairness, precedent, and practical difficulty. A and B are wrong because more than one reason is given. D is incorrect because the speaker does not list four reasons.
3
Who does the speaker say often calls for institutions to rescind honours?
不正解
正解:
A
説明:
Correct: The passage states that 'students and alumni have called' for rescinding honours. B, C, and D are plausible groups but are not mentioned as the ones calling for rescinding in the passage.
4
Which negative outcome does the speaker warn about if institutions rush to rescind awards?
不正解
正解:
A
説明:
Correct: The speaker warns of a 'chilling effect' where future decisions avoid criticism rather than focus on merit. B is incorrect and not mentioned; financial gain is not discussed. C is wrong; the speaker does not claim rescinding improves standards. D is incorrect because the speaker actually mentions legal fights as a potential problem, not legal immunity.
5
What can be inferred about the speaker's overall position?
不正解
正解:
C
説明:
Correct: The speaker explicitly favours careful, case-by-case consideration and rejects both a rush to revoke and an absolute ban. A is wrong because the speaker is cautious, not absolutist. B is incorrect because the speaker says 'I do not suggest never rescinding.' D is wrong; the speaker criticizes decisions made to satisfy public pressure, not to gain publicity.
6
Why does the speaker mention the idea of 'precedent'?
不正解
正解:
A
説明:
Correct: The passage explains that rescinding one award can set a precedent that invites constant review. B is incorrect because the speaker treats precedent as a reason for caution, not an automatic improvement. C is wrong; the speaker does not claim legal binding. D is incorrect and contradicts the speaker's call for case-by-case consideration.
7
In this passage, what is the closest meaning of the word 'rescind'?
不正解
正解:
A
説明:
Correct: 'Rescind' is used to mean taking back or revoking an honorary degree. B is the opposite of rescind. C (postpone) is incorrect because rescind implies cancellation, not delay. D (strengthen) is unrelated to the meaning in context.
リスニングをスピーキングに変換
LexiTalkアプリで即座のフィードバックと毎日の練習を取得。
アプリをダウンロード