第1回
字幕なしで聞く
字幕なしで大意、テーマ、主要な情報をつかみます。
🎧 IELTSリスニングスピーキング練習
0:00 / 0:00
5回リスニング法
1本のリスニング教材を再利用できる英語インプットに変える
1回聞いて終わりにしないでください。同じエピソードを5回に分けて、まず大意、次に言語面の確認、シャドーイング、ディクテーション、最後に字幕なしで聞き直します。
第2回
英語字幕を見る
知らない語や難しい文を確認します。必要なら辞書や短いメモを使います。
第3回
シャドーイング
1文ずつ繰り返し、発音、リズム、強勢、イントネーションをまねします。
第4回
ディクテーション
聞こえた内容から重要な文をいくつか書き取り、形と構造を鍛えます。
第5回
字幕なしで再聴
文字の助けなしで再度聞き、以前より分かる部分が増えたことを確認します。
トレーニング後
共有して言い換える
メモ、新出語、役立つ概念を共有し、その後で自分の言葉でエピソードを言い換えましょう。
次のステップ
精聴から多聴へ
集中的に学習したエピソードを後で流し聞きに回し、慣れた素材で聞く量を増やしましょう。
第1回第2回第3回第4回第5回
📝 IELTSスピーキングダイアログトランスクリプト
Today I'm thinking about truth and exaggeration in public life. I want to talk about how facts are treated. Some people peddle conspiracy theories because they want attention. Local blogs sometimes peddle unverified rumours to increase traffic. Politicians may prevaricate when they face awkward questions. At times a spokesperson will prevaricate to avoid admitting a mistake. Scandals often mention embezzlement in passing. For example, a local charity faced accusations of embezzlement last year. Courts can summon bank records and officials during an inquiry. In one recent case the judge had to summon three witnesses to clarify accounts. The media loves hyperbole. Headlines use hyperbole to make stories seem more dramatic than they are. Hyperbole distorts how the public perceives an issue. That distortion can make it harder to hold people to account. I believe peddling stories and repeated prevarication weaken trust. Allegations of embezzlement, even if unproven, can do lasting damage. Authorities must not only summon evidence, but show it transparently. Finally, while critics sometimes use hyperbole themselves, we should respond with careful facts, not rumours we peddle.
📝 📚 IELTS練習問題
1
What did the speaker say courts can summon during an inquiry?
不正解
正解:
A
説明:
Correct: The speaker explicitly said 'Courts can summon bank records and officials during an inquiry.' B, C and D are plausible actions in general, but they were not mentioned in the passage.
2
Which group did the speaker give as an example that peddles unverified rumours?
不正解
正解:
A
説明:
Correct: The speaker said 'Local blogs sometimes peddle unverified rumours.' National broadcasters, academic journals and police reports were not identified as such in the passage and thus are incorrect.
3
The speaker used an example of embezzlement involving which organisation?
不正解
正解:
A
説明:
Correct: The speaker mentioned 'a local charity faced accusations of embezzlement.' The other organisations are plausible contexts but were not mentioned.
4
Why does the speaker mention hyperbole?
不正解
正解:
A
説明:
Correct: The speaker said 'Headlines use hyperbole to make stories seem more dramatic' and 'Hyperbole distorts how the public perceives an issue.' B is wrong because the tone is critical, not praising. C is incorrect; the speaker did not link hyperbole to helping investigations. D is incorrect; the speaker argued for facts, not that hyperbole replaces them.
5
What can be inferred about the speaker's view of prevarication?
不正解
正解:
A
説明:
Correct: The speaker linked 'repeated prevarication' with weakening trust and said it makes accountability harder. B is the opposite of the speaker's view. C is incorrect as the speaker suggested prevarication harms accountability. D is not supported; the speaker did not claim it was legally required.
6
In this passage, what does the word 'peddle' most nearly mean?
不正解
正解:
B
説明:
Correct: 'Peddle' is used in context with 'conspiracy theories' and 'unverified rumours,' meaning to promote or spread them. A is a literal meaning of peddle but not the sense used here. C and D are unrelated to the meaning in context.
7
According to the speaker, besides summoning evidence, what should authorities do?
不正解
正解:
A
説明:
Correct: The speaker said 'Authorities must not only summon evidence, but show it transparently.' B, C and D contradict the speaker's call for transparent handling and were not stated.
リスニングをスピーキングに変換
LexiTalkアプリで即座のフィードバックと毎日の練習を取得。
アプリをダウンロード