第1回
字幕なしで聞く
字幕なしで大意、テーマ、主要な情報をつかみます。
🎧 IELTSリスニングスピーキング練習
0:00 / 0:00
5回リスニング法
1本のリスニング教材を再利用できる英語インプットに変える
1回聞いて終わりにしないでください。同じエピソードを5回に分けて、まず大意、次に言語面の確認、シャドーイング、ディクテーション、最後に字幕なしで聞き直します。
第2回
英語字幕を見る
知らない語や難しい文を確認します。必要なら辞書や短いメモを使います。
第3回
シャドーイング
1文ずつ繰り返し、発音、リズム、強勢、イントネーションをまねします。
第4回
ディクテーション
聞こえた内容から重要な文をいくつか書き取り、形と構造を鍛えます。
第5回
字幕なしで再聴
文字の助けなしで再度聞き、以前より分かる部分が増えたことを確認します。
トレーニング後
共有して言い換える
メモ、新出語、役立つ概念を共有し、その後で自分の言葉でエピソードを言い換えましょう。
次のステップ
精聴から多聴へ
集中的に学習したエピソードを後で流し聞きに回し、慣れた素材で聞く量を増やしましょう。
第1回第2回第3回第4回第5回
📝 IELTSスピーキングダイアログトランスクリプト
I visited a small contemporary gallery last week to review a new show. The whole exhibition felt like a pastiche of styles. Each room stitched together different movements. One piece was almost pure pastiche, and that was deliberate. The curator tried to exculpate the artist from accusations of copying. He issued a statement to exculpate him and asked critics to withhold judgement. Yet no single document seemed able to clear the question entirely. The opening night was memorable. It rained heavily that evening. The show was scheduled to run for six weeks, although some press reports claimed eight. The most striking thing was an injection of bright colour in several works. At times the artist used a literal injection device to push pigment into layers of canvas. That technique gave the paintings a stained look. The sculptures often featured scabrous textures. Some pieces used horribly scabrous humour to shock the audience. Many images were mildly suggestive in theme. Other works were strongly suggestive of earlier masters. I should add that lighting was dim on purpose. The dim light created intimacy. Overall, the exhibition was provocative but uneven. It raised questions about originality, taste, and whether controversy can exculpate poor craft.
📝 📚 IELTS練習問題
1
How did the critic describe the overall style of the exhibition?
不正解
正解:
A
説明:
Correct: The critic explicitly said it 'felt like a pastiche of styles.' B is wrong because the critic did not describe it as minimalist. C is wrong because 'classical revival' was not mentioned. D is wrong because there was no reference to the exhibition being purely digital.
2
What did the curator do in response to accusations against the artist?
不正解
正解:
A
説明:
Correct: The passage says the curator 'tried to exculpate the artist' and issued a statement. B is wrong because the curator did not accuse the artist. C is wrong because the exhibition was scheduled to run for six weeks and was not said to have closed early. D is wrong because there is no mention of removing works.
3
Which technique did the artist use to apply pigment, as mentioned by the critic?
不正解
正解:
A
説明:
Correct: The critic stated the artist 'used a literal injection device to push pigment into layers of canvas.' B is wrong because spray paint was not mentioned. C is wrong because traditional glazing/varnish was not described. D is wrong because there was no mention of digital printing.
4
Why can the humour in some pieces be described as 'scabrous' according to the passage?
不正解
正解:
A
説明:
Correct: 'Scabrous humour' in the passage refers to humour intended to shock and be coarse. B is wrong because while 'scabrous' could be mistaken for medical, here it refers to crudeness, not medicine. C is wrong because 'scabrous' is the opposite of subtle and polite. D is wrong because there is no mention of ancient texts as a cause.
5
In this context, what does the word 'pastiche' most nearly mean?
不正解
正解:
A
説明:
Correct: 'Pastiche' refers to a work that blends or imitates different styles, matching the passage's use. B is wrong because pastiche implies borrowing rather than pure originality. C is wrong because it is not a medical term here. D is wrong because pastiche has nothing to do with lighting.
6
What can be inferred about the result of attempts to clear the artist of wrongdoing?
不正解
正解:
A
説明:
Correct: The critic notes the curator tried to exculpate the artist but 'no single document seemed able to clear the question entirely,' implying suspicion remained. B is wrong because he was not said to be fully cleared. C is wrong because there is no mention of an admission. D is wrong because there was no definitive proof provided.
7
How long was the exhibition scheduled to run, according to the critic?
不正解
正解:
A
説明:
Correct: The passage states 'The show was scheduled to run for six weeks.' B is wrong because eight weeks was mentioned as a press claim, not the critic's stated schedule. C and D are wrong because they were not mentioned.
リスニングをスピーキングに変換
LexiTalkアプリで即座のフィードバックと毎日の練習を取得。
アプリをダウンロード