第1回
字幕なしで聞く
字幕なしで大意、テーマ、主要な情報をつかみます。
🎧 IELTSリスニングスピーキング練習
0:00 / 0:00
5回リスニング法
1本のリスニング教材を再利用できる英語インプットに変える
1回聞いて終わりにしないでください。同じエピソードを5回に分けて、まず大意、次に言語面の確認、シャドーイング、ディクテーション、最後に字幕なしで聞き直します。
第2回
英語字幕を見る
知らない語や難しい文を確認します。必要なら辞書や短いメモを使います。
第3回
シャドーイング
1文ずつ繰り返し、発音、リズム、強勢、イントネーションをまねします。
第4回
ディクテーション
聞こえた内容から重要な文をいくつか書き取り、形と構造を鍛えます。
第5回
字幕なしで再聴
文字の助けなしで再度聞き、以前より分かる部分が増えたことを確認します。
トレーニング後
共有して言い換える
メモ、新出語、役立つ概念を共有し、その後で自分の言葉でエピソードを言い換えましょう。
次のステップ
精聴から多聴へ
集中的に学習したエピソードを後で流し聞きに回し、慣れた素材で聞く量を増やしましょう。
第1回第2回第3回第4回第5回
📝 IELTSスピーキングダイアログトランスクリプト
I want to talk about the ambivalence many residents feel toward urban redevelopment. There is genuine hope for better housing, and at the same time a deep ambivalence about what will be lost. If planners get decisions wrong they can cripple local transport links. A sudden closure or ill-judged scheme could also cripple a family business on the high street. These changes often create a ripple across neighbourhoods. One project creates ripples that reach as far as school funding and local volunteering schemes. Elderly people tell me derelict shopfronts seem to leer at passersby, like empty eyes judging the street. Even new billboards can leer down from rebuilt facades and feel intrusive to the same people. I should say a council report from 2017 warned that piecemeal redevelopment risks social division. The city hired a consultancy in 2019 that recommended rapid demolition, which many locals opposed. My point is not to block change. Rather, I argue for smaller pilots, active consultation, and policies that reduce the ripple effects of displacement. If we ignore that ambivalence, we risk projects that look impressive but actually weaken communities and cripple what made those places liveable.
📝 📚 IELTS練習問題
1
What single word does the speaker use to describe residents' mixed feelings about redevelopment?
不正解
正解:
A
説明:
Correct: The speaker explicitly uses the word 'ambivalence' twice to describe mixed feelings. B is wrong because although hope is mentioned, the key term is ambivalence. C is wrong because apathy implies no interest, which contradicts the speaker's description. D is wrong because hostility is stronger than the mixed feelings the speaker describes.
2
According to the speaker, what might planners 'cripple' if they make wrong decisions?
不正解
正解:
A
説明:
Correct: The speaker says 'they can cripple local transport links.' B, C and D are not mentioned and are implausible in this local redevelopment context, so they are incorrect.
3
Which consequence does the speaker give as an example of the 'ripple' effect?
不正解
正解:
A
説明:
Correct: The speaker says ripples 'reach as far as school funding.' B, C and D are not mentioned and are broader effects not cited in the passage, so they are wrong.
4
How does the speaker describe the appearance of abandoned shopfronts?
不正解
正解:
A
説明:
Correct: The speaker uses the phrase 'derelict shopfronts seem to leer at passersby.' B, C and D contradict the description of derelict, intrusive shopfronts and are therefore incorrect.
5
Why does the speaker mention the 2017 council report?
不正解
正解:
A
説明:
Correct: The speaker states the 2017 report 'warned that piecemeal redevelopment risks social division,' so it was cited as a warning. B is wrong because the speaker says locals opposed rapid demolition recommended later, not praising it. C and D are not mentioned in relation to the report.
6
What does the speaker imply about large, rapid redevelopment projects?
不正解
正解:
A
説明:
Correct: The speaker warns such projects may 'look impressive but actually weaken communities and cripple what made those places liveable.' B, C and D contradict this implication and are therefore incorrect.
7
In this passage, what is the best meaning of 'cripple' as used by the speaker?
不正解
正解:
A
説明:
Correct: 'Cripple' is used to mean severely harm or disable local services or businesses. B, C and D are unrelated and do not fit the negative, damaging sense conveyed in the passage.
リスニングをスピーキングに変換
LexiTalkアプリで即座のフィードバックと毎日の練習を取得。
アプリをダウンロード