1회차
자막 없이 듣기
자막 없이 전체 흐름, 주제, 핵심 정보를 파악합니다.
🎧 IELTS 듣기 말하기 연습
0:00 / 0:00
5회 듣기 학습법
하나의 듣기 콘텐츠를 재사용 가능한 영어 입력으로 바꾸기
한 번 듣고 끝내지 마세요. 같은 에피소드를 다섯 번으로 나누어 먼저 큰 흐름을 잡고, 그다음 언어 확인, 섀도잉, 받아쓰기, 마지막으로 자막 없이 다시 듣습니다.
2회차
영어 자막 보기
모르는 단어와 어려운 문장을 해결합니다. 필요하면 사전과 짧은 메모를 활용하세요.
3회차
섀도잉
문장별로 따라 말하며 발음, 리듬, 강세, 억양을 모방합니다.
4회차
받아쓰기
들리는 핵심 문장을 몇 개 적어 보며 형태와 구조를 훈련합니다.
5회차
자막 없이 다시 듣기
텍스트 도움 없이 다시 듣고, 이제 더 쉽고 분명해진 부분을 확인합니다.
학습 후
공유하고 다시 말하기
메모, 새 단어, 유용한 개념을 공유한 뒤 자신의 말로 에피소드를 다시 말해 보세요.
다음 단계
집중 듣기에서 광범위 듣기로
집중적으로 학습한 에피소드를 배경 청취로 재활용하고, 익숙한 자료로 청취량을 늘리세요.
1회차2회차3회차4회차5회차
📝 IELTS 스피킹 대화 대본
I want to talk about criticism in public life. Good criticism can sharpen thinking. It can reveal weak points and suggest better ideas. But lately, online responses often do the opposite. Too frequently people rush to eviscerate an argument with a single harsh reply. That means they strip away nuance and leave nothing constructive. I have even seen commentators eviscerate a person’s reputation rather than address the idea. A recent, widely quoted survey claimed 60% of respondents said they prefer blunt feedback. And last year, a headline argued that 500 thought leaders were effectively deplatformed on one network. Those figures make the point, but they also distract from the real issue. The main problem is not numbers. It is tone. The best critics take time. They explain specific flaws. They offer alternatives and invite dialogue. Think of a teacher correcting a draft calmly, compared with a mob piling on in replies. To improve public debate we should pause before replying. We should ask clarifying questions. Schools could teach digital civility as part of citizenship classes. If we slow down, we may avoid needlessly trying to eviscerate every opposing view.
📝 📚 IELTS 연습 문제
1
What main concern does the speaker express about online criticism?
오답
정답:
A
설명:
Correct: The speaker repeatedly says online criticism 'eviscerates' arguments and reputations instead of being constructive. Option B is incorrect because although the speaker mentions statistics, they say numbers distract from the issue, not that statistics are the main concern. Option C is wrong; the speaker criticizes quick, rushed responses, not slowness. Option D is incorrect because the speaker complains about harsh criticism, not excessive praise.
2
Which statistic did the speaker mention from a recent survey?
오답
정답:
B
설명:
Correct: The passage states 'a recent, widely quoted survey claimed 60% of respondents said they prefer blunt feedback.' Option A, C, and D are plausible-sounding distractors but are not mentioned in the passage.
3
Which example does the speaker use to contrast helpful and harmful criticism?
오답
정답:
A
설명:
Correct: The speaker explicitly contrasts 'a teacher correcting a draft calmly' with 'a mob piling on in replies.' Options B, C, and D are related ideas but are not the example used in the passage.
4
Why does the speaker suggest pausing before replying online?
오답
정답:
A
설명:
Correct: The speaker recommends pausing so people do not 'needlessly try to eviscerate every opposing view.' Option B is incorrect; there is no mention of deferring to news outlets. Option C is opposite to the speaker's aims—going viral is not a goal discussed. Option D is not supported; the speaker focuses on tone and quality, not comment counts.
5
In this context, what is the best meaning of the word 'eviscerate' as used by the speaker?
오답
정답:
C
설명:
Correct: 'Eviscerate' is used to describe stripping away nuance or gutting an argument or reputation, meaning to destroy or remove essential parts. Option A is incorrect because it is the opposite. Option B is wrong; 'eviscerate' implies active attack, not ignoring. Option D is incorrect because careful editing is constructive, whereas 'eviscerate' is destructive in this usage.
6
What does the speaker imply about the 'best critics'?
오답
정답:
A
설명:
Correct: The speaker says 'The best critics take time. They explain specific flaws. They offer alternatives and invite dialogue.' Option B is unsupported; length of commentary is not mentioned. Option C is wrong because the speaker criticizes blunt feedback when it is destructive. Option D is incorrect; the speaker does not claim critics should avoid statistics.
7
Which institution does the speaker suggest could help improve public debate?
오답
정답:
A
설명:
Correct: The speaker explicitly says 'Schools could teach digital civility as part of citizenship classes.' Options B, C, and D are plausible-sounding but are not suggested in the passage.
듣기를 말하기로 전환
LexiTalk 앱에서 즉각적인 피드백과 일일 연습을 받으세요.
앱 다운로드