1회차
자막 없이 듣기
자막 없이 전체 흐름, 주제, 핵심 정보를 파악합니다.
🎧 IELTS 듣기 말하기 연습
0:00 / 0:00
5회 듣기 학습법
하나의 듣기 콘텐츠를 재사용 가능한 영어 입력으로 바꾸기
한 번 듣고 끝내지 마세요. 같은 에피소드를 다섯 번으로 나누어 먼저 큰 흐름을 잡고, 그다음 언어 확인, 섀도잉, 받아쓰기, 마지막으로 자막 없이 다시 듣습니다.
2회차
영어 자막 보기
모르는 단어와 어려운 문장을 해결합니다. 필요하면 사전과 짧은 메모를 활용하세요.
3회차
섀도잉
문장별로 따라 말하며 발음, 리듬, 강세, 억양을 모방합니다.
4회차
받아쓰기
들리는 핵심 문장을 몇 개 적어 보며 형태와 구조를 훈련합니다.
5회차
자막 없이 다시 듣기
텍스트 도움 없이 다시 듣고, 이제 더 쉽고 분명해진 부분을 확인합니다.
학습 후
공유하고 다시 말하기
메모, 새 단어, 유용한 개념을 공유한 뒤 자신의 말로 에피소드를 다시 말해 보세요.
다음 단계
집중 듣기에서 광범위 듣기로
집중적으로 학습한 에피소드를 배경 청취로 재활용하고, 익숙한 자료로 청취량을 늘리세요.
1회차2회차3회차4회차5회차
📝 IELTS 스피킹 대화 대본
I'm thinking today about how societies handle public art and monuments. Some communities rush to act when a statue becomes controversial. Authorities will often swoop in and remove a piece overnight. A similar sudden swoop happened in one town when workers took down a figure without public consultation. People often talk about what values we should enshrine in law. Many argue that we must enshrine protection for historical objects, even if they offend some citizens. At the same time, blatant neglect of context is common. Sometimes there is blatant vandalism, or a blatant refusal to explain why a piece is kept. I remember a misshapen bronze figure in my city. The head looked misshapen after a questionable restoration. That statue was originally carved in 1872 by a local artist. It was reportedly replaced with a replica in 1999. A council meeting in 2015 supposedly confirmed its status. I do not think sudden action is always right. Hasty removals can ignore reasoned debate. Careful decisions help avoid a rash swoop and ensure we enshrine a considered history. Otherwise we risk keeping misshapen memories and celebrating blatant mistakes.
📝 📚 IELTS 연습 문제
1
What is the main subject of the speaker's talk?
오답
정답:
B
설명:
The speaker discusses how societies handle public art and monuments, especially when controversy arises. Option A is too narrow (restoration), C focuses on the artist rather than the wider debate, and D focuses only on removal techniques, which is not the main point.
2
According to the speaker, what action did authorities sometimes take?
오답
정답:
B
설명:
The passage states that authorities will often 'swoop in and remove a piece overnight.' Option A contradicts the idea of quick action, C misreads 'enshrine' as what authorities always do, and D is not mentioned at all.
3
Which adjective did the speaker use to describe the visible damage to a statue?
오답
정답:
C
설명:
The speaker specifically describes a bronze figure as 'misshapen.' 'Elegant' and 'pristine' are opposite in meaning. 'Transparent' is unrelated to physical damage.
4
What can be inferred about the speaker's attitude to sudden removals of monuments?
오답
정답:
C
설명:
The speaker criticizes 'hasty removals' and says careful decisions help avoid rash swoops, indicating opposition to sudden action. Option A contradicts this. B is incorrect because the speaker expresses an opinion. D is not suggested in the text.
5
Why does the speaker mention the idea to 'enshrine protection for historical objects'?
오답
정답:
B
설명:
The speaker says many argue we must 'enshrine protection for historical objects,' meaning place protection into law to preserve heritage. A is unrelated, C misinterprets enshrine as rigid permanence beyond the speaker's point, and D takes the word literally rather than legally.
6
In this passage, the word 'blatant' most nearly means:
오답
정답:
B
설명:
The speaker uses 'blatant' in contexts like 'blatant vandalism' and 'blatant refusal', where it means obvious or flagrant. 'Subtle' and 'accidental' are opposite in meaning, and 'legal' is unrelated.
7
Which specific year did the speaker say a replica replaced the original statue?
오답
정답:
B
설명:
The speaker states the statue 'was reportedly replaced with a replica in 1999.' Option A is the year given for the original carving, C is the year mentioned for a council meeting, and D is not mentioned and is therefore incorrect.
듣기를 말하기로 전환
LexiTalk 앱에서 즉각적인 피드백과 일일 연습을 받으세요.
앱 다운로드