1회차
자막 없이 듣기
자막 없이 전체 흐름, 주제, 핵심 정보를 파악합니다.
🎧 IELTS 듣기 말하기 연습
0:00 / 0:00
5회 듣기 학습법
하나의 듣기 콘텐츠를 재사용 가능한 영어 입력으로 바꾸기
한 번 듣고 끝내지 마세요. 같은 에피소드를 다섯 번으로 나누어 먼저 큰 흐름을 잡고, 그다음 언어 확인, 섀도잉, 받아쓰기, 마지막으로 자막 없이 다시 듣습니다.
2회차
영어 자막 보기
모르는 단어와 어려운 문장을 해결합니다. 필요하면 사전과 짧은 메모를 활용하세요.
3회차
섀도잉
문장별로 따라 말하며 발음, 리듬, 강세, 억양을 모방합니다.
4회차
받아쓰기
들리는 핵심 문장을 몇 개 적어 보며 형태와 구조를 훈련합니다.
5회차
자막 없이 다시 듣기
텍스트 도움 없이 다시 듣고, 이제 더 쉽고 분명해진 부분을 확인합니다.
학습 후
공유하고 다시 말하기
메모, 새 단어, 유용한 개념을 공유한 뒤 자신의 말로 에피소드를 다시 말해 보세요.
다음 단계
집중 듣기에서 광범위 듣기로
집중적으로 학습한 에피소드를 배경 청취로 재활용하고, 익숙한 자료로 청취량을 늘리세요.
1회차2회차3회차4회차5회차
📝 IELTS 스피킹 대화 대본
I want to talk about whether universities should rescind honorary degrees and awards. Recently, students and alumni have called for institutions to rescind honours awarded to controversial figures. Some commentators argue that revoking an honour repairs a university's reputation. I am more cautious. I will give three reasons why institutions should think twice before they take back an award. First, fairness. People change over time and judging past behaviour is complicated. Second, precedent. Rescinding one award can set a precedent that invites constant review. Third, practical difficulty. Records are messy and legal fights can follow. I mention a couple of high-profile cases from around 2015 that grabbed headlines and prompted demands. That detail is interesting but not decisive. We should be wary of a chilling effect, where future decisions are made to avoid criticism rather than for academic merit. In short, I favour careful, case-by-case consideration. I do not suggest never rescinding. Nor do I suggest a rush to revoke honours to satisfy immediate public pressure. Institutions should weigh fairness, precedent, and practical consequences before they rescind an award.
📝 📚 IELTS 연습 문제
1
What is the main topic of the passage?
오답
정답:
A
설명:
Correct: The speaker explicitly discusses whether universities should rescind honorary degrees. B is related but too general—the passage focuses on rescinding, not improving reputation generally. C is incorrect because the passage addresses taking awards back, not how they are granted. D is wrong; student protests are mentioned but legal procedures for protests are not discussed.
2
How many reasons does the speaker give for being cautious about rescinding awards?
오답
정답:
C
설명:
Correct: The speaker lists three reasons: fairness, precedent, and practical difficulty. A and B are wrong because more than one reason is given. D is incorrect because the speaker does not list four reasons.
3
Who does the speaker say often calls for institutions to rescind honours?
오답
정답:
A
설명:
Correct: The passage states that 'students and alumni have called' for rescinding honours. B, C, and D are plausible groups but are not mentioned as the ones calling for rescinding in the passage.
4
Which negative outcome does the speaker warn about if institutions rush to rescind awards?
오답
정답:
A
설명:
Correct: The speaker warns of a 'chilling effect' where future decisions avoid criticism rather than focus on merit. B is incorrect and not mentioned; financial gain is not discussed. C is wrong; the speaker does not claim rescinding improves standards. D is incorrect because the speaker actually mentions legal fights as a potential problem, not legal immunity.
5
What can be inferred about the speaker's overall position?
오답
정답:
C
설명:
Correct: The speaker explicitly favours careful, case-by-case consideration and rejects both a rush to revoke and an absolute ban. A is wrong because the speaker is cautious, not absolutist. B is incorrect because the speaker says 'I do not suggest never rescinding.' D is wrong; the speaker criticizes decisions made to satisfy public pressure, not to gain publicity.
6
Why does the speaker mention the idea of 'precedent'?
오답
정답:
A
설명:
Correct: The passage explains that rescinding one award can set a precedent that invites constant review. B is incorrect because the speaker treats precedent as a reason for caution, not an automatic improvement. C is wrong; the speaker does not claim legal binding. D is incorrect and contradicts the speaker's call for case-by-case consideration.
7
In this passage, what is the closest meaning of the word 'rescind'?
오답
정답:
A
설명:
Correct: 'Rescind' is used to mean taking back or revoking an honorary degree. B is the opposite of rescind. C (postpone) is incorrect because rescind implies cancellation, not delay. D (strengthen) is unrelated to the meaning in context.
듣기를 말하기로 전환
LexiTalk 앱에서 즉각적인 피드백과 일일 연습을 받으세요.
앱 다운로드