1회차
자막 없이 듣기
자막 없이 전체 흐름, 주제, 핵심 정보를 파악합니다.
🎧 IELTS 듣기 말하기 연습
0:00 / 0:00
5회 듣기 학습법
하나의 듣기 콘텐츠를 재사용 가능한 영어 입력으로 바꾸기
한 번 듣고 끝내지 마세요. 같은 에피소드를 다섯 번으로 나누어 먼저 큰 흐름을 잡고, 그다음 언어 확인, 섀도잉, 받아쓰기, 마지막으로 자막 없이 다시 듣습니다.
2회차
영어 자막 보기
모르는 단어와 어려운 문장을 해결합니다. 필요하면 사전과 짧은 메모를 활용하세요.
3회차
섀도잉
문장별로 따라 말하며 발음, 리듬, 강세, 억양을 모방합니다.
4회차
받아쓰기
들리는 핵심 문장을 몇 개 적어 보며 형태와 구조를 훈련합니다.
5회차
자막 없이 다시 듣기
텍스트 도움 없이 다시 듣고, 이제 더 쉽고 분명해진 부분을 확인합니다.
학습 후
공유하고 다시 말하기
메모, 새 단어, 유용한 개념을 공유한 뒤 자신의 말로 에피소드를 다시 말해 보세요.
다음 단계
집중 듣기에서 광범위 듣기로
집중적으로 학습한 에피소드를 배경 청취로 재활용하고, 익숙한 자료로 청취량을 늘리세요.
1회차2회차3회차4회차5회차
📝 IELTS 스피킹 대화 대본
I want to talk about how shock is used in advertising and how consumers respond. Recent campaigns use dramatic moments to get attention. One commercial literally shows an actor delivering a slap to another character. The image is hard to ignore. The creators said the intention was to jolt viewers. The slogan even aims to feel like a slap in the face to complacent consumers. It targets people who have grown comfortable with predictable ads. The campaign ran online and increased engagement by 42 percent. Sales rose too, by about 8 percent over three months. Marketers then claimed the ad won an industry award in Berlin, and they released it in April. I mention those details because some are impressive, and some may be overstated. My point is that a startling image can boost short-term metrics. But it can also erode trust if people feel manipulated. So, while a slap can shock and attract, it should be paired with honesty and value. That way brands avoid alienating the very audience they want to win.
📝 📚 IELTS 연습 문제
1
What physical action is described as appearing in the commercial?
오답
정답:
B
설명:
Correct: The passage explicitly says 'an actor delivering a slap to another character.'
Why A is wrong: A hug is not mentioned in the passage.
Why C is wrong: A handshake is not described.
Why D is wrong: A wave is not mentioned; the text focuses on a startling physical action, the slap.
2
By how much did online engagement increase, according to the speaker?
오답
정답:
C
설명:
Correct: The speaker states that the campaign 'increased engagement by 42 percent.'
Why A is wrong: 15 percent is not the figure given.
Why B is wrong: 30 percent is not mentioned and is lower than the stated increase.
Why D is wrong: 60 percent is not in the passage and is higher than the stated figure.
3
Over what period did sales rise by about 8 percent?
오답
정답:
B
설명:
Correct: The passage says sales rose 'by about 8 percent over three months.'
Why A is wrong: One month is not the period mentioned.
Why C is wrong: Six months is longer than the stated three months.
Why D is wrong: One year is not accurate; the passage specifies three months.
4
Which of these claims about the campaign is presented but later suggested might be overstated?
오답
정답:
C
설명:
Correct: The speaker mentions the claim that "the ad won an industry award in Berlin" and then says some details may be overstated, implying this kind of claim could be exaggerated.
Why A is wrong: The increase in engagement is presented as a concrete statistic, not suggested as overstated.
Why B is wrong: The sales rise is also given as a measured figure and not questioned.
Why D is wrong: The slogan's intent to shock is described as the campaign's purpose; it's not presented as an overstated claim.
5
What inference can you make about the speaker's attitude toward shock tactics in ads?
오답
정답:
C
설명:
Correct: The speaker says a startling image can boost short-term metrics but 'can also erode trust,' so shock is useful but risky.
Why A is wrong: The speaker does not fully endorse shock as the only effective strategy; they warn about risks.
Why B is wrong: They do not say shock tactics are useless; they acknowledge benefits.
Why D is wrong: The passage argues shock tactics clearly affect consumer behaviour, so they are not irrelevant.
6
Why does the speaker refer to 'complacent consumers'?
오답
정답:
B
설명:
Correct: The passage explains the slogan aims to 'feel like a slap in the face to complacent consumers' and clarifies these are people 'who have grown comfortable with predictable ads.'
Why A is wrong: The speaker does not claim consumers are always hostile to new ads.
Why C is wrong: The passage does not say complacent consumers are unwilling to buy; it says they are used to predictable advertising.
Why D is wrong: Being complacent does not mean being extremely well informed; it means being self-satisfied and unchallenged.
7
In this context, what is the best meaning of 'complacent' as used in the passage?
오답
정답:
A
설명:
Correct: 'Complacent' means self-satisfied and unconcerned, matching the idea of people comfortable with predictable ads.
Why B is wrong: 'Actively hostile' is the opposite of complacent.
Why C is wrong: 'Highly knowledgeable' is not implied by complacency.
Why D is wrong: 'Extremely excited' contradicts the calm, unchallenged sense of complacency.
듣기를 말하기로 전환
LexiTalk 앱에서 즉각적인 피드백과 일일 연습을 받으세요.
앱 다운로드