1회차
자막 없이 듣기
자막 없이 전체 흐름, 주제, 핵심 정보를 파악합니다.
🎧 IELTS 듣기 말하기 연습
0:00 / 0:00
5회 듣기 학습법
하나의 듣기 콘텐츠를 재사용 가능한 영어 입력으로 바꾸기
한 번 듣고 끝내지 마세요. 같은 에피소드를 다섯 번으로 나누어 먼저 큰 흐름을 잡고, 그다음 언어 확인, 섀도잉, 받아쓰기, 마지막으로 자막 없이 다시 듣습니다.
2회차
영어 자막 보기
모르는 단어와 어려운 문장을 해결합니다. 필요하면 사전과 짧은 메모를 활용하세요.
3회차
섀도잉
문장별로 따라 말하며 발음, 리듬, 강세, 억양을 모방합니다.
4회차
받아쓰기
들리는 핵심 문장을 몇 개 적어 보며 형태와 구조를 훈련합니다.
5회차
자막 없이 다시 듣기
텍스트 도움 없이 다시 듣고, 이제 더 쉽고 분명해진 부분을 확인합니다.
학습 후
공유하고 다시 말하기
메모, 새 단어, 유용한 개념을 공유한 뒤 자신의 말로 에피소드를 다시 말해 보세요.
다음 단계
집중 듣기에서 광범위 듣기로
집중적으로 학습한 에피소드를 배경 청취로 재활용하고, 익숙한 자료로 청취량을 늘리세요.
1회차2회차3회차4회차5회차
📝 IELTS 스피킹 대화 대본
I visited a small contemporary gallery last week to review a new show. The whole exhibition felt like a pastiche of styles. Each room stitched together different movements. One piece was almost pure pastiche, and that was deliberate. The curator tried to exculpate the artist from accusations of copying. He issued a statement to exculpate him and asked critics to withhold judgement. Yet no single document seemed able to clear the question entirely. The opening night was memorable. It rained heavily that evening. The show was scheduled to run for six weeks, although some press reports claimed eight. The most striking thing was an injection of bright colour in several works. At times the artist used a literal injection device to push pigment into layers of canvas. That technique gave the paintings a stained look. The sculptures often featured scabrous textures. Some pieces used horribly scabrous humour to shock the audience. Many images were mildly suggestive in theme. Other works were strongly suggestive of earlier masters. I should add that lighting was dim on purpose. The dim light created intimacy. Overall, the exhibition was provocative but uneven. It raised questions about originality, taste, and whether controversy can exculpate poor craft.
📝 📚 IELTS 연습 문제
1
How did the critic describe the overall style of the exhibition?
오답
정답:
A
설명:
Correct: The critic explicitly said it 'felt like a pastiche of styles.' B is wrong because the critic did not describe it as minimalist. C is wrong because 'classical revival' was not mentioned. D is wrong because there was no reference to the exhibition being purely digital.
2
What did the curator do in response to accusations against the artist?
오답
정답:
A
설명:
Correct: The passage says the curator 'tried to exculpate the artist' and issued a statement. B is wrong because the curator did not accuse the artist. C is wrong because the exhibition was scheduled to run for six weeks and was not said to have closed early. D is wrong because there is no mention of removing works.
3
Which technique did the artist use to apply pigment, as mentioned by the critic?
오답
정답:
A
설명:
Correct: The critic stated the artist 'used a literal injection device to push pigment into layers of canvas.' B is wrong because spray paint was not mentioned. C is wrong because traditional glazing/varnish was not described. D is wrong because there was no mention of digital printing.
4
Why can the humour in some pieces be described as 'scabrous' according to the passage?
오답
정답:
A
설명:
Correct: 'Scabrous humour' in the passage refers to humour intended to shock and be coarse. B is wrong because while 'scabrous' could be mistaken for medical, here it refers to crudeness, not medicine. C is wrong because 'scabrous' is the opposite of subtle and polite. D is wrong because there is no mention of ancient texts as a cause.
5
In this context, what does the word 'pastiche' most nearly mean?
오답
정답:
A
설명:
Correct: 'Pastiche' refers to a work that blends or imitates different styles, matching the passage's use. B is wrong because pastiche implies borrowing rather than pure originality. C is wrong because it is not a medical term here. D is wrong because pastiche has nothing to do with lighting.
6
What can be inferred about the result of attempts to clear the artist of wrongdoing?
오답
정답:
A
설명:
Correct: The critic notes the curator tried to exculpate the artist but 'no single document seemed able to clear the question entirely,' implying suspicion remained. B is wrong because he was not said to be fully cleared. C is wrong because there is no mention of an admission. D is wrong because there was no definitive proof provided.
7
How long was the exhibition scheduled to run, according to the critic?
오답
정답:
A
설명:
Correct: The passage states 'The show was scheduled to run for six weeks.' B is wrong because eight weeks was mentioned as a press claim, not the critic's stated schedule. C and D are wrong because they were not mentioned.
듣기를 말하기로 전환
LexiTalk 앱에서 즉각적인 피드백과 일일 연습을 받으세요.
앱 다운로드