1회차
자막 없이 듣기
자막 없이 전체 흐름, 주제, 핵심 정보를 파악합니다.
🎧 IELTS 듣기 말하기 연습
0:00 / 0:00
5회 듣기 학습법
하나의 듣기 콘텐츠를 재사용 가능한 영어 입력으로 바꾸기
한 번 듣고 끝내지 마세요. 같은 에피소드를 다섯 번으로 나누어 먼저 큰 흐름을 잡고, 그다음 언어 확인, 섀도잉, 받아쓰기, 마지막으로 자막 없이 다시 듣습니다.
2회차
영어 자막 보기
모르는 단어와 어려운 문장을 해결합니다. 필요하면 사전과 짧은 메모를 활용하세요.
3회차
섀도잉
문장별로 따라 말하며 발음, 리듬, 강세, 억양을 모방합니다.
4회차
받아쓰기
들리는 핵심 문장을 몇 개 적어 보며 형태와 구조를 훈련합니다.
5회차
자막 없이 다시 듣기
텍스트 도움 없이 다시 듣고, 이제 더 쉽고 분명해진 부분을 확인합니다.
학습 후
공유하고 다시 말하기
메모, 새 단어, 유용한 개념을 공유한 뒤 자신의 말로 에피소드를 다시 말해 보세요.
다음 단계
집중 듣기에서 광범위 듣기로
집중적으로 학습한 에피소드를 배경 청취로 재활용하고, 익숙한 자료로 청취량을 늘리세요.
1회차2회차3회차4회차5회차
📝 IELTS 스피킹 대화 대본
I want to talk about poise in public life. Poise keeps you steady when criticism arrives. Last year I moderated a panel and there was a sudden frenzy in the audience. The frenzy began after an accusation about one speaker. I was only 22 when it happened, which surprised some people. The room held about 300 attendees and two judges on the stage. The committee had introduced draconian regulations for the event. Those draconian rules restricted how we responded. A tiny freckle on my colleague's cheek was mistaken for an ink mark during the uproar. That same freckle was mentioned repeatedly in online posts. We tried to vindicate his reputation with emails and statements. Only clear evidence could vindicate him fully in the eyes of the public. I believe poise helped me manage the situation calmly. I resisted the immediate urge to escalate. The frenzy online made that hard. I think strict policies that are draconian often backfire. In this case, the rules amplified the problem instead of solving it. My aim was to restore trust and avoid a spectacle. In the end we provided documents and witnesses. That approach reduced the frenzy and helped vindicate my friend. Small details such as a freckle should never determine guilt.
📝 📚 IELTS 연습 문제
1
What quality does the speaker emphasise as important in public situations?
오답
정답:
A
설명:
The speaker explicitly states 'I want to talk about poise' and repeats that 'Poise keeps you steady' and 'I believe poise helped me manage the situation.' Options B, C and D are not mentioned and are irrelevant to the speaker's emphasis.
2
What small physical mark was mistaken for an ink mark during the uproar?
오답
정답:
A
설명:
The passage states 'A tiny freckle on my colleague's cheek was mistaken for an ink mark.' The other options are plausible-sounding distractors but are not mentioned in the text.
3
What kind of measures did the committee introduce for the event?
오답
정답:
A
설명:
The speaker says 'The committee had introduced draconian regulations' and later refers to 'Those draconian rules.' The other choices contradict the description in the passage.
4
Approximately how many people attended the event, according to the speaker?
오답
정답:
B
설명:
The speaker gives the detail 'The room held about 300 attendees.' The other numbers are not supported by the passage and are included as plausible but incorrect distractors.
5
Why was vindicating the colleague difficult, as implied by the speaker?
오답
정답:
A
설명:
The speaker says 'Only clear evidence could vindicate him fully,' implying a lack of clear evidence made vindication difficult. Options B, C and D are not supported by the passage and contradict the described circumstances.
6
What is the speaker's attitude toward strict, draconian policies?
오답
정답:
A
설명:
The speaker explicitly states 'I think strict policies that are draconian often backfire' and gives an example of rules amplifying the problem. Options B, C and D contradict this view or are inaccurate.
7
As used in the passage, what does 'vindicate' most nearly mean?
오답
정답:
A
설명:
The speaker uses 'vindicate' in the context of restoring a reputation with evidence: 'Only clear evidence could vindicate him fully.' This means to clear from blame or justify. The other options misrepresent the meaning: vindicate does not mean punish, automatically forgive, or ignore.
듣기를 말하기로 전환
LexiTalk 앱에서 즉각적인 피드백과 일일 연습을 받으세요.
앱 다운로드