第一遍
無字幕盲聽
先抓大意，確認主題、人物關係與主要資訊。
🎧 雅思聽力口語練習
0:00 / 0:00
五遍聽力法
把一段聽力內容練成可重複利用的英語輸入
不要只聽完就結束。把同一條內容拆成 5 遍，先抓大意，再解決語言點，再模仿、聽寫、複聽，最後把內容變成自己的表達。
第二遍
看英文字幕
解決生詞和難句，可以查字典、做簡短筆記。
第三遍
跟讀 shadowing
逐句模仿語音語調、節奏與重音，盡量貼近原聲。
第四遍
少量聽寫
挑幾句關鍵句做聽寫，訓練從聲音到句子的組織能力。
第五遍
無字幕複聽
查漏補缺，回到純聽，感受英語聲音和節奏。
訓練後動作 1
分享與複述
分享你的筆記、新詞或概念，並用自己的話複述內容，促進資訊重組與輸出。
訓練後動作 2
精聽轉泛聽
精聽過的材料後續可轉成泛聽。比如精聽 10 期後，把舊材料當成日常泛聽輸入。
第一遍第二遍第三遍第四遍第五遍
📝 雅思口語對話文本
I want to talk about whether universities should rescind honorary degrees and awards. Recently, students and alumni have called for institutions to rescind honours awarded to controversial figures. Some commentators argue that revoking an honour repairs a university's reputation. I am more cautious. I will give three reasons why institutions should think twice before they take back an award. First, fairness. People change over time and judging past behaviour is complicated. Second, precedent. Rescinding one award can set a precedent that invites constant review. Third, practical difficulty. Records are messy and legal fights can follow. I mention a couple of high-profile cases from around 2015 that grabbed headlines and prompted demands. That detail is interesting but not decisive. We should be wary of a chilling effect, where future decisions are made to avoid criticism rather than for academic merit. In short, I favour careful, case-by-case consideration. I do not suggest never rescinding. Nor do I suggest a rush to revoke honours to satisfy immediate public pressure. Institutions should weigh fairness, precedent, and practical consequences before they rescind an award.
📝 📚 雅思練習題
1
What is the main topic of the passage?
答案錯誤
正確答案:
A
解釋:
Correct: The speaker explicitly discusses whether universities should rescind honorary degrees. B is related but too general—the passage focuses on rescinding, not improving reputation generally. C is incorrect because the passage addresses taking awards back, not how they are granted. D is wrong; student protests are mentioned but legal procedures for protests are not discussed.
2
How many reasons does the speaker give for being cautious about rescinding awards?
答案錯誤
正確答案:
C
解釋:
Correct: The speaker lists three reasons: fairness, precedent, and practical difficulty. A and B are wrong because more than one reason is given. D is incorrect because the speaker does not list four reasons.
3
Who does the speaker say often calls for institutions to rescind honours?
答案錯誤
正確答案:
A
解釋:
Correct: The passage states that 'students and alumni have called' for rescinding honours. B, C, and D are plausible groups but are not mentioned as the ones calling for rescinding in the passage.
4
Which negative outcome does the speaker warn about if institutions rush to rescind awards?
答案錯誤
正確答案:
A
解釋:
Correct: The speaker warns of a 'chilling effect' where future decisions avoid criticism rather than focus on merit. B is incorrect and not mentioned; financial gain is not discussed. C is wrong; the speaker does not claim rescinding improves standards. D is incorrect because the speaker actually mentions legal fights as a potential problem, not legal immunity.
5
What can be inferred about the speaker's overall position?
答案錯誤
正確答案:
C
解釋:
Correct: The speaker explicitly favours careful, case-by-case consideration and rejects both a rush to revoke and an absolute ban. A is wrong because the speaker is cautious, not absolutist. B is incorrect because the speaker says 'I do not suggest never rescinding.' D is wrong; the speaker criticizes decisions made to satisfy public pressure, not to gain publicity.
6
Why does the speaker mention the idea of 'precedent'?
答案錯誤
正確答案:
A
解釋:
Correct: The passage explains that rescinding one award can set a precedent that invites constant review. B is incorrect because the speaker treats precedent as a reason for caution, not an automatic improvement. C is wrong; the speaker does not claim legal binding. D is incorrect and contradicts the speaker's call for case-by-case consideration.
7
In this passage, what is the closest meaning of the word 'rescind'?
答案錯誤
正確答案:
A
解釋:
Correct: 'Rescind' is used to mean taking back or revoking an honorary degree. B is the opposite of rescind. C (postpone) is incorrect because rescind implies cancellation, not delay. D (strengthen) is unrelated to the meaning in context.
將聽力轉化為口語
在LexiTalk應用中獲得即時反饋和每日練習。
下載應用