Putaran 1
Dengar tanpa subtitle
Pahami gambaran besar, topik, dan informasi utama tanpa subtitle.
🎧 Latihan IELTS Mendengar & Berbicara
0:00 / 0:00
Metode mendengarkan lima putaran
Ubah satu konten listening menjadi input bahasa Inggris yang bisa dipakai ulang
Jangan berhenti di satu kali putar. Bagi episode yang sama menjadi lima putaran: pahami inti dulu, lalu dukungan bahasa, shadowing, dikte, dan terakhir dengarkan ulang tanpa subtitle.
Putaran 2
Subtitle Inggris
Pahami kata yang belum dikenal dan kalimat yang sulit. Gunakan kamus dan catatan singkat bila perlu.
Putaran 3
Shadowing
Ikuti kalimat demi kalimat dan tirukan pengucapan, ritme, tekanan, dan intonasi.
Putaran 4
Dikte
Tulis beberapa kalimat penting dari yang Anda dengar untuk melatih bentuk dan struktur.
Putaran 5
Dengar ulang tanpa subtitle
Dengarkan lagi tanpa bantuan teks dan perhatikan apa yang sekarang terasa lebih jelas.
Setelah latihan
Bagikan dan ceritakan ulang
Bagikan catatan, kosakata baru, atau satu konsep yang berguna, lalu ceritakan ulang episode dengan kata-kata Anda sendiri.
Langkah berikutnya
Dari intensive ke extensive
Gunakan kembali episode yang sudah dipelajari secara intensif sebagai bahan dengar latar dan tambah volume dengan materi yang familiar.
Putaran 1Putaran 2Putaran 3Putaran 4Putaran 5
📝 Transkrip Dialog IELTS Speaking
I want to talk about criticism in public life. Good criticism can sharpen thinking. It can reveal weak points and suggest better ideas. But lately, online responses often do the opposite. Too frequently people rush to eviscerate an argument with a single harsh reply. That means they strip away nuance and leave nothing constructive. I have even seen commentators eviscerate a person’s reputation rather than address the idea. A recent, widely quoted survey claimed 60% of respondents said they prefer blunt feedback. And last year, a headline argued that 500 thought leaders were effectively deplatformed on one network. Those figures make the point, but they also distract from the real issue. The main problem is not numbers. It is tone. The best critics take time. They explain specific flaws. They offer alternatives and invite dialogue. Think of a teacher correcting a draft calmly, compared with a mob piling on in replies. To improve public debate we should pause before replying. We should ask clarifying questions. Schools could teach digital civility as part of citizenship classes. If we slow down, we may avoid needlessly trying to eviscerate every opposing view.
📝 📚 Soal Latihan IELTS
1
What main concern does the speaker express about online criticism?
Jawaban Salah
Jawaban Benar:
A
Penjelasan:
Correct: The speaker repeatedly says online criticism 'eviscerates' arguments and reputations instead of being constructive. Option B is incorrect because although the speaker mentions statistics, they say numbers distract from the issue, not that statistics are the main concern. Option C is wrong; the speaker criticizes quick, rushed responses, not slowness. Option D is incorrect because the speaker complains about harsh criticism, not excessive praise.
2
Which statistic did the speaker mention from a recent survey?
Jawaban Salah
Jawaban Benar:
B
Penjelasan:
Correct: The passage states 'a recent, widely quoted survey claimed 60% of respondents said they prefer blunt feedback.' Option A, C, and D are plausible-sounding distractors but are not mentioned in the passage.
3
Which example does the speaker use to contrast helpful and harmful criticism?
Jawaban Salah
Jawaban Benar:
A
Penjelasan:
Correct: The speaker explicitly contrasts 'a teacher correcting a draft calmly' with 'a mob piling on in replies.' Options B, C, and D are related ideas but are not the example used in the passage.
4
Why does the speaker suggest pausing before replying online?
Jawaban Salah
Jawaban Benar:
A
Penjelasan:
Correct: The speaker recommends pausing so people do not 'needlessly try to eviscerate every opposing view.' Option B is incorrect; there is no mention of deferring to news outlets. Option C is opposite to the speaker's aims—going viral is not a goal discussed. Option D is not supported; the speaker focuses on tone and quality, not comment counts.
5
In this context, what is the best meaning of the word 'eviscerate' as used by the speaker?
Jawaban Salah
Jawaban Benar:
C
Penjelasan:
Correct: 'Eviscerate' is used to describe stripping away nuance or gutting an argument or reputation, meaning to destroy or remove essential parts. Option A is incorrect because it is the opposite. Option B is wrong; 'eviscerate' implies active attack, not ignoring. Option D is incorrect because careful editing is constructive, whereas 'eviscerate' is destructive in this usage.
6
What does the speaker imply about the 'best critics'?
Jawaban Salah
Jawaban Benar:
A
Penjelasan:
Correct: The speaker says 'The best critics take time. They explain specific flaws. They offer alternatives and invite dialogue.' Option B is unsupported; length of commentary is not mentioned. Option C is wrong because the speaker criticizes blunt feedback when it is destructive. Option D is incorrect; the speaker does not claim critics should avoid statistics.
7
Which institution does the speaker suggest could help improve public debate?
Jawaban Salah
Jawaban Benar:
A
Penjelasan:
Correct: The speaker explicitly says 'Schools could teach digital civility as part of citizenship classes.' Options B, C, and D are plausible-sounding but are not suggested in the passage.
Ubah Mendengarkan menjadi Berbicara
Dapatkan umpan balik instan dan latihan harian di app LexiTalk.
Unduh App