Putaran 1
Dengar tanpa subtitle
Pahami gambaran besar, topik, dan informasi utama tanpa subtitle.
🎧 Latihan IELTS Mendengar & Berbicara
0:00 / 0:00
Metode mendengarkan lima putaran
Ubah satu konten listening menjadi input bahasa Inggris yang bisa dipakai ulang
Jangan berhenti di satu kali putar. Bagi episode yang sama menjadi lima putaran: pahami inti dulu, lalu dukungan bahasa, shadowing, dikte, dan terakhir dengarkan ulang tanpa subtitle.
Putaran 2
Subtitle Inggris
Pahami kata yang belum dikenal dan kalimat yang sulit. Gunakan kamus dan catatan singkat bila perlu.
Putaran 3
Shadowing
Ikuti kalimat demi kalimat dan tirukan pengucapan, ritme, tekanan, dan intonasi.
Putaran 4
Dikte
Tulis beberapa kalimat penting dari yang Anda dengar untuk melatih bentuk dan struktur.
Putaran 5
Dengar ulang tanpa subtitle
Dengarkan lagi tanpa bantuan teks dan perhatikan apa yang sekarang terasa lebih jelas.
Setelah latihan
Bagikan dan ceritakan ulang
Bagikan catatan, kosakata baru, atau satu konsep yang berguna, lalu ceritakan ulang episode dengan kata-kata Anda sendiri.
Langkah berikutnya
Dari intensive ke extensive
Gunakan kembali episode yang sudah dipelajari secara intensif sebagai bahan dengar latar dan tambah volume dengan materi yang familiar.
Putaran 1Putaran 2Putaran 3Putaran 4Putaran 5
📝 Transkrip Dialog IELTS Speaking
I want to talk about whether universities should rescind honorary degrees and awards. Recently, students and alumni have called for institutions to rescind honours awarded to controversial figures. Some commentators argue that revoking an honour repairs a university's reputation. I am more cautious. I will give three reasons why institutions should think twice before they take back an award. First, fairness. People change over time and judging past behaviour is complicated. Second, precedent. Rescinding one award can set a precedent that invites constant review. Third, practical difficulty. Records are messy and legal fights can follow. I mention a couple of high-profile cases from around 2015 that grabbed headlines and prompted demands. That detail is interesting but not decisive. We should be wary of a chilling effect, where future decisions are made to avoid criticism rather than for academic merit. In short, I favour careful, case-by-case consideration. I do not suggest never rescinding. Nor do I suggest a rush to revoke honours to satisfy immediate public pressure. Institutions should weigh fairness, precedent, and practical consequences before they rescind an award.
📝 📚 Soal Latihan IELTS
1
What is the main topic of the passage?
Jawaban Salah
Jawaban Benar:
A
Penjelasan:
Correct: The speaker explicitly discusses whether universities should rescind honorary degrees. B is related but too general—the passage focuses on rescinding, not improving reputation generally. C is incorrect because the passage addresses taking awards back, not how they are granted. D is wrong; student protests are mentioned but legal procedures for protests are not discussed.
2
How many reasons does the speaker give for being cautious about rescinding awards?
Jawaban Salah
Jawaban Benar:
C
Penjelasan:
Correct: The speaker lists three reasons: fairness, precedent, and practical difficulty. A and B are wrong because more than one reason is given. D is incorrect because the speaker does not list four reasons.
3
Who does the speaker say often calls for institutions to rescind honours?
Jawaban Salah
Jawaban Benar:
A
Penjelasan:
Correct: The passage states that 'students and alumni have called' for rescinding honours. B, C, and D are plausible groups but are not mentioned as the ones calling for rescinding in the passage.
4
Which negative outcome does the speaker warn about if institutions rush to rescind awards?
Jawaban Salah
Jawaban Benar:
A
Penjelasan:
Correct: The speaker warns of a 'chilling effect' where future decisions avoid criticism rather than focus on merit. B is incorrect and not mentioned; financial gain is not discussed. C is wrong; the speaker does not claim rescinding improves standards. D is incorrect because the speaker actually mentions legal fights as a potential problem, not legal immunity.
5
What can be inferred about the speaker's overall position?
Jawaban Salah
Jawaban Benar:
C
Penjelasan:
Correct: The speaker explicitly favours careful, case-by-case consideration and rejects both a rush to revoke and an absolute ban. A is wrong because the speaker is cautious, not absolutist. B is incorrect because the speaker says 'I do not suggest never rescinding.' D is wrong; the speaker criticizes decisions made to satisfy public pressure, not to gain publicity.
6
Why does the speaker mention the idea of 'precedent'?
Jawaban Salah
Jawaban Benar:
A
Penjelasan:
Correct: The passage explains that rescinding one award can set a precedent that invites constant review. B is incorrect because the speaker treats precedent as a reason for caution, not an automatic improvement. C is wrong; the speaker does not claim legal binding. D is incorrect and contradicts the speaker's call for case-by-case consideration.
7
In this passage, what is the closest meaning of the word 'rescind'?
Jawaban Salah
Jawaban Benar:
A
Penjelasan:
Correct: 'Rescind' is used to mean taking back or revoking an honorary degree. B is the opposite of rescind. C (postpone) is incorrect because rescind implies cancellation, not delay. D (strengthen) is unrelated to the meaning in context.
Ubah Mendengarkan menjadi Berbicara
Dapatkan umpan balik instan dan latihan harian di app LexiTalk.
Unduh App