Putaran 1
Dengar tanpa subtitle
Pahami gambaran besar, topik, dan informasi utama tanpa subtitle.
🎧 Latihan IELTS Mendengar & Berbicara
0:00 / 0:00
Metode mendengarkan lima putaran
Ubah satu konten listening menjadi input bahasa Inggris yang bisa dipakai ulang
Jangan berhenti di satu kali putar. Bagi episode yang sama menjadi lima putaran: pahami inti dulu, lalu dukungan bahasa, shadowing, dikte, dan terakhir dengarkan ulang tanpa subtitle.
Putaran 2
Subtitle Inggris
Pahami kata yang belum dikenal dan kalimat yang sulit. Gunakan kamus dan catatan singkat bila perlu.
Putaran 3
Shadowing
Ikuti kalimat demi kalimat dan tirukan pengucapan, ritme, tekanan, dan intonasi.
Putaran 4
Dikte
Tulis beberapa kalimat penting dari yang Anda dengar untuk melatih bentuk dan struktur.
Putaran 5
Dengar ulang tanpa subtitle
Dengarkan lagi tanpa bantuan teks dan perhatikan apa yang sekarang terasa lebih jelas.
Setelah latihan
Bagikan dan ceritakan ulang
Bagikan catatan, kosakata baru, atau satu konsep yang berguna, lalu ceritakan ulang episode dengan kata-kata Anda sendiri.
Langkah berikutnya
Dari intensive ke extensive
Gunakan kembali episode yang sudah dipelajari secara intensif sebagai bahan dengar latar dan tambah volume dengan materi yang familiar.
Putaran 1Putaran 2Putaran 3Putaran 4Putaran 5
📝 Transkrip Dialog IELTS Speaking
Many people talk about the futility of small actions. Three years ago I joined a local campaign to save a small library, and some neighbours called that effort proof of futility. I do not share that view. Protest and community work can reinvigorate interest in public life. In that campaign we raised two thousand dollars and used social media to reinvigorate volunteers. A scrupulous check of facts was essential. We needed to be scrupulous when we published claims about the council budget. Careless or vile statements appeared online. At times critics used vile language to attack volunteers. That vile rhetoric damaged trust and made calm debate harder. If we ignore evidence and fail to learn, we risk regress. Poor planning can cause communities to regress to old, inefficient practices. Education is a better tool. Education and new technologies together can reinvigorate civic debate. I also believe that insisting on scrupulous standards of proof protects discussion from becoming toxic. Some people say action is pointless, or that protest only provokes violence. I think that stance misunderstands the purpose. A thoughtful citizen should avoid the futility of cynicism and try to improve matters.
📝 📚 Soal Latihan IELTS
1
When did the speaker join the local campaign to save the library?
Jawaban Salah
Jawaban Benar:
B
Penjelasan:
The passage states 'Three years ago I joined a local campaign ...'. Option B is correct. 'Last month', 'In 2010', and 'Ten years ago' are not mentioned and conflict with the stated timeframe.
2
How much money did the campaign raise, according to the speaker?
Jawaban Salah
Jawaban Benar:
A
Penjelasan:
The speaker says 'we raised two thousand dollars'. The other amounts are plausible distractors but do not match the detail given in the passage.
3
Which two things does the speaker mention together as able to reinvigorate civic debate?
Jawaban Salah
Jawaban Benar:
A
Penjelasan:
The passage says 'Education and new technologies together can reinvigorate civic debate.' Options B, C, and D are not presented as the combined solution in the text and therefore are incorrect.
4
What is the speaker's attitude toward protest and community action?
Jawaban Salah
Jawaban Benar:
B
Penjelasan:
The speaker disagrees with claims of futility and argues that 'Protest and community work can reinvigorate interest in public life.' Thus option B is correct. Options A, C, and D contradict the speaker's view expressed in the passage.
5
In this context, what does the word 'scrupulous' most nearly mean?
Jawaban Salah
Jawaban Benar:
B
Penjelasan:
The speaker refers to 'a scrupulous check of facts' and 'scrupulous standards of proof', implying careful and thorough attention. 'Careless', 'quick and superficial', and 'indifferent' are opposites of that meaning.
6
Why does the speaker mention 'vile' language and rhetoric?
Jawaban Salah
Jawaban Benar:
B
Penjelasan:
The passage states 'That vile rhetoric damaged trust and made calm debate harder.' So the speaker mentions it because it harmed discussion. Options A and D are the opposite of the speaker's negative view, and option C contradicts the passage which explicitly says such statements appeared.
7
What does the speaker warn might happen if people ignore evidence and fail to learn?
Jawaban Salah
Jawaban Benar:
C
Penjelasan:
The speaker warns 'If we ignore evidence and fail to learn, we risk regress' and later mentions communities regressing to old, inefficient practices. Options A, B, and D describe positive outcomes not supported by the passage.
Ubah Mendengarkan menjadi Berbicara
Dapatkan umpan balik instan dan latihan harian di app LexiTalk.
Unduh App