1회차
자막 없이 듣기
자막 없이 전체 흐름, 주제, 핵심 정보를 파악합니다.
🎧 IELTS 듣기 말하기 연습
0:00 / 0:00
5회 듣기 학습법
하나의 듣기 콘텐츠를 재사용 가능한 영어 입력으로 바꾸기
한 번 듣고 끝내지 마세요. 같은 에피소드를 다섯 번으로 나누어 먼저 큰 흐름을 잡고, 그다음 언어 확인, 섀도잉, 받아쓰기, 마지막으로 자막 없이 다시 듣습니다.
2회차
영어 자막 보기
모르는 단어와 어려운 문장을 해결합니다. 필요하면 사전과 짧은 메모를 활용하세요.
3회차
섀도잉
문장별로 따라 말하며 발음, 리듬, 강세, 억양을 모방합니다.
4회차
받아쓰기
들리는 핵심 문장을 몇 개 적어 보며 형태와 구조를 훈련합니다.
5회차
자막 없이 다시 듣기
텍스트 도움 없이 다시 듣고, 이제 더 쉽고 분명해진 부분을 확인합니다.
학습 후
공유하고 다시 말하기
메모, 새 단어, 유용한 개념을 공유한 뒤 자신의 말로 에피소드를 다시 말해 보세요.
다음 단계
집중 듣기에서 광범위 듣기로
집중적으로 학습한 에피소드를 배경 청취로 재활용하고, 익숙한 자료로 청취량을 늘리세요.
1회차2회차3회차4회차5회차
📝 IELTS 스피킹 대화 대본
I want to talk about the ambivalence many residents feel toward urban redevelopment. There is genuine hope for better housing, and at the same time a deep ambivalence about what will be lost. If planners get decisions wrong they can cripple local transport links. A sudden closure or ill-judged scheme could also cripple a family business on the high street. These changes often create a ripple across neighbourhoods. One project creates ripples that reach as far as school funding and local volunteering schemes. Elderly people tell me derelict shopfronts seem to leer at passersby, like empty eyes judging the street. Even new billboards can leer down from rebuilt facades and feel intrusive to the same people. I should say a council report from 2017 warned that piecemeal redevelopment risks social division. The city hired a consultancy in 2019 that recommended rapid demolition, which many locals opposed. My point is not to block change. Rather, I argue for smaller pilots, active consultation, and policies that reduce the ripple effects of displacement. If we ignore that ambivalence, we risk projects that look impressive but actually weaken communities and cripple what made those places liveable.
📝 📚 IELTS 연습 문제
1
What single word does the speaker use to describe residents' mixed feelings about redevelopment?
오답
정답:
A
설명:
Correct: The speaker explicitly uses the word 'ambivalence' twice to describe mixed feelings. B is wrong because although hope is mentioned, the key term is ambivalence. C is wrong because apathy implies no interest, which contradicts the speaker's description. D is wrong because hostility is stronger than the mixed feelings the speaker describes.
2
According to the speaker, what might planners 'cripple' if they make wrong decisions?
오답
정답:
A
설명:
Correct: The speaker says 'they can cripple local transport links.' B, C and D are not mentioned and are implausible in this local redevelopment context, so they are incorrect.
3
Which consequence does the speaker give as an example of the 'ripple' effect?
오답
정답:
A
설명:
Correct: The speaker says ripples 'reach as far as school funding.' B, C and D are not mentioned and are broader effects not cited in the passage, so they are wrong.
4
How does the speaker describe the appearance of abandoned shopfronts?
오답
정답:
A
설명:
Correct: The speaker uses the phrase 'derelict shopfronts seem to leer at passersby.' B, C and D contradict the description of derelict, intrusive shopfronts and are therefore incorrect.
5
Why does the speaker mention the 2017 council report?
오답
정답:
A
설명:
Correct: The speaker states the 2017 report 'warned that piecemeal redevelopment risks social division,' so it was cited as a warning. B is wrong because the speaker says locals opposed rapid demolition recommended later, not praising it. C and D are not mentioned in relation to the report.
6
What does the speaker imply about large, rapid redevelopment projects?
오답
정답:
A
설명:
Correct: The speaker warns such projects may 'look impressive but actually weaken communities and cripple what made those places liveable.' B, C and D contradict this implication and are therefore incorrect.
7
In this passage, what is the best meaning of 'cripple' as used by the speaker?
오답
정답:
A
설명:
Correct: 'Cripple' is used to mean severely harm or disable local services or businesses. B, C and D are unrelated and do not fit the negative, damaging sense conveyed in the passage.
듣기를 말하기로 전환
LexiTalk 앱에서 즉각적인 피드백과 일일 연습을 받으세요.
앱 다운로드