第一遍
無字幕盲聽
先抓大意，確認主題、人物關係與主要資訊。
🎧 雅思聽力口語練習
0:00 / 0:00
五遍聽力法
把一段聽力內容練成可重複利用的英語輸入
不要只聽完就結束。把同一條內容拆成 5 遍，先抓大意，再解決語言點，再模仿、聽寫、複聽，最後把內容變成自己的表達。
第二遍
看英文字幕
解決生詞和難句，可以查字典、做簡短筆記。
第三遍
跟讀 shadowing
逐句模仿語音語調、節奏與重音，盡量貼近原聲。
第四遍
少量聽寫
挑幾句關鍵句做聽寫，訓練從聲音到句子的組織能力。
第五遍
無字幕複聽
查漏補缺，回到純聽，感受英語聲音和節奏。
訓練後動作 1
分享與複述
分享你的筆記、新詞或概念，並用自己的話複述內容，促進資訊重組與輸出。
訓練後動作 2
精聽轉泛聽
精聽過的材料後續可轉成泛聽。比如精聽 10 期後，把舊材料當成日常泛聽輸入。
第一遍第二遍第三遍第四遍第五遍
📝 雅思口語對話文本
I want to talk about criticism in public life. Good criticism can sharpen thinking. It can reveal weak points and suggest better ideas. But lately, online responses often do the opposite. Too frequently people rush to eviscerate an argument with a single harsh reply. That means they strip away nuance and leave nothing constructive. I have even seen commentators eviscerate a person’s reputation rather than address the idea. A recent, widely quoted survey claimed 60% of respondents said they prefer blunt feedback. And last year, a headline argued that 500 thought leaders were effectively deplatformed on one network. Those figures make the point, but they also distract from the real issue. The main problem is not numbers. It is tone. The best critics take time. They explain specific flaws. They offer alternatives and invite dialogue. Think of a teacher correcting a draft calmly, compared with a mob piling on in replies. To improve public debate we should pause before replying. We should ask clarifying questions. Schools could teach digital civility as part of citizenship classes. If we slow down, we may avoid needlessly trying to eviscerate every opposing view.
📝 📚 雅思練習題
1
What main concern does the speaker express about online criticism?
答案錯誤
正確答案:
A
解釋:
Correct: The speaker repeatedly says online criticism 'eviscerates' arguments and reputations instead of being constructive. Option B is incorrect because although the speaker mentions statistics, they say numbers distract from the issue, not that statistics are the main concern. Option C is wrong; the speaker criticizes quick, rushed responses, not slowness. Option D is incorrect because the speaker complains about harsh criticism, not excessive praise.
2
Which statistic did the speaker mention from a recent survey?
答案錯誤
正確答案:
B
解釋:
Correct: The passage states 'a recent, widely quoted survey claimed 60% of respondents said they prefer blunt feedback.' Option A, C, and D are plausible-sounding distractors but are not mentioned in the passage.
3
Which example does the speaker use to contrast helpful and harmful criticism?
答案錯誤
正確答案:
A
解釋:
Correct: The speaker explicitly contrasts 'a teacher correcting a draft calmly' with 'a mob piling on in replies.' Options B, C, and D are related ideas but are not the example used in the passage.
4
Why does the speaker suggest pausing before replying online?
答案錯誤
正確答案:
A
解釋:
Correct: The speaker recommends pausing so people do not 'needlessly try to eviscerate every opposing view.' Option B is incorrect; there is no mention of deferring to news outlets. Option C is opposite to the speaker's aims—going viral is not a goal discussed. Option D is not supported; the speaker focuses on tone and quality, not comment counts.
5
In this context, what is the best meaning of the word 'eviscerate' as used by the speaker?
答案錯誤
正確答案:
C
解釋:
Correct: 'Eviscerate' is used to describe stripping away nuance or gutting an argument or reputation, meaning to destroy or remove essential parts. Option A is incorrect because it is the opposite. Option B is wrong; 'eviscerate' implies active attack, not ignoring. Option D is incorrect because careful editing is constructive, whereas 'eviscerate' is destructive in this usage.
6
What does the speaker imply about the 'best critics'?
答案錯誤
正確答案:
A
解釋:
Correct: The speaker says 'The best critics take time. They explain specific flaws. They offer alternatives and invite dialogue.' Option B is unsupported; length of commentary is not mentioned. Option C is wrong because the speaker criticizes blunt feedback when it is destructive. Option D is incorrect; the speaker does not claim critics should avoid statistics.
7
Which institution does the speaker suggest could help improve public debate?
答案錯誤
正確答案:
A
解釋:
Correct: The speaker explicitly says 'Schools could teach digital civility as part of citizenship classes.' Options B, C, and D are plausible-sounding but are not suggested in the passage.
將聽力轉化為口語
在LexiTalk應用中獲得即時反饋和每日練習。
下載應用