Pass 1
Blind listen
Listen without subtitles and only catch the big idea, topic, and main information.
🎧 IELTS Listening & Speaking Practice
0:00 / 0:00
Five-Pass Listening Method
Turn one listening piece into reusable English input
Do not stop at one play. Split the same episode into five passes: gist first, then language support, shadowing, dictation, and a final replay without subtitles.
Pass 2
English subtitles
Clear up unknown words and hard sentences. Use a dictionary and short notes if needed.
Pass 3
Shadowing
Repeat line by line and imitate pronunciation, rhythm, stress, and intonation.
Pass 4
Dictation
Pick a few key sentences and write what you hear to train form and structure.
Pass 5
Replay without subtitles
Listen again with no text support and notice what is now easier and clearer.
After Training
Share and retell
Share notes, new words, or one useful concept, then retell the episode in your own words.
Next Step
From intensive to extensive
Recycle intensively studied episodes as background listening and scale volume with familiar material.
Pass 1Pass 2Pass 3Pass 4Pass 5
📝 IELTS Speaking Dialogue Transcript
I want to talk about criticism in public life. Good criticism can sharpen thinking. It can reveal weak points and suggest better ideas. But lately, online responses often do the opposite. Too frequently people rush to eviscerate an argument with a single harsh reply. That means they strip away nuance and leave nothing constructive. I have even seen commentators eviscerate a person’s reputation rather than address the idea. A recent, widely quoted survey claimed 60% of respondents said they prefer blunt feedback. And last year, a headline argued that 500 thought leaders were effectively deplatformed on one network. Those figures make the point, but they also distract from the real issue. The main problem is not numbers. It is tone. The best critics take time. They explain specific flaws. They offer alternatives and invite dialogue. Think of a teacher correcting a draft calmly, compared with a mob piling on in replies. To improve public debate we should pause before replying. We should ask clarifying questions. Schools could teach digital civility as part of citizenship classes. If we slow down, we may avoid needlessly trying to eviscerate every opposing view.
📝 📚 IELTS Practice Questions
1
What main concern does the speaker express about online criticism?
Wrong Answer
Correct Answer:
A
Explanation:
Correct: The speaker repeatedly says online criticism 'eviscerates' arguments and reputations instead of being constructive. Option B is incorrect because although the speaker mentions statistics, they say numbers distract from the issue, not that statistics are the main concern. Option C is wrong; the speaker criticizes quick, rushed responses, not slowness. Option D is incorrect because the speaker complains about harsh criticism, not excessive praise.
2
Which statistic did the speaker mention from a recent survey?
Wrong Answer
Correct Answer:
B
Explanation:
Correct: The passage states 'a recent, widely quoted survey claimed 60% of respondents said they prefer blunt feedback.' Option A, C, and D are plausible-sounding distractors but are not mentioned in the passage.
3
Which example does the speaker use to contrast helpful and harmful criticism?
Wrong Answer
Correct Answer:
A
Explanation:
Correct: The speaker explicitly contrasts 'a teacher correcting a draft calmly' with 'a mob piling on in replies.' Options B, C, and D are related ideas but are not the example used in the passage.
4
Why does the speaker suggest pausing before replying online?
Wrong Answer
Correct Answer:
A
Explanation:
Correct: The speaker recommends pausing so people do not 'needlessly try to eviscerate every opposing view.' Option B is incorrect; there is no mention of deferring to news outlets. Option C is opposite to the speaker's aims—going viral is not a goal discussed. Option D is not supported; the speaker focuses on tone and quality, not comment counts.
5
In this context, what is the best meaning of the word 'eviscerate' as used by the speaker?
Wrong Answer
Correct Answer:
C
Explanation:
Correct: 'Eviscerate' is used to describe stripping away nuance or gutting an argument or reputation, meaning to destroy or remove essential parts. Option A is incorrect because it is the opposite. Option B is wrong; 'eviscerate' implies active attack, not ignoring. Option D is incorrect because careful editing is constructive, whereas 'eviscerate' is destructive in this usage.
6
What does the speaker imply about the 'best critics'?
Wrong Answer
Correct Answer:
A
Explanation:
Correct: The speaker says 'The best critics take time. They explain specific flaws. They offer alternatives and invite dialogue.' Option B is unsupported; length of commentary is not mentioned. Option C is wrong because the speaker criticizes blunt feedback when it is destructive. Option D is incorrect; the speaker does not claim critics should avoid statistics.
7
Which institution does the speaker suggest could help improve public debate?
Wrong Answer
Correct Answer:
A
Explanation:
Correct: The speaker explicitly says 'Schools could teach digital civility as part of citizenship classes.' Options B, C, and D are plausible-sounding but are not suggested in the passage.
Turn Listening into Speaking
Get instant feedback and daily practice in the LexiTalk app.
Download the App