Pass 1
Blind listen
Listen without subtitles and only catch the big idea, topic, and main information.
🎧 IELTS Listening & Speaking Practice
0:00 / 0:00
Five-Pass Listening Method
Turn one listening piece into reusable English input
Do not stop at one play. Split the same episode into five passes: gist first, then language support, shadowing, dictation, and a final replay without subtitles.
Pass 2
English subtitles
Clear up unknown words and hard sentences. Use a dictionary and short notes if needed.
Pass 3
Shadowing
Repeat line by line and imitate pronunciation, rhythm, stress, and intonation.
Pass 4
Dictation
Pick a few key sentences and write what you hear to train form and structure.
Pass 5
Replay without subtitles
Listen again with no text support and notice what is now easier and clearer.
After Training
Share and retell
Share notes, new words, or one useful concept, then retell the episode in your own words.
Next Step
From intensive to extensive
Recycle intensively studied episodes as background listening and scale volume with familiar material.
Pass 1Pass 2Pass 3Pass 4Pass 5
📝 IELTS Speaking Dialogue Transcript
Many people talk about the futility of small actions. Three years ago I joined a local campaign to save a small library, and some neighbours called that effort proof of futility. I do not share that view. Protest and community work can reinvigorate interest in public life. In that campaign we raised two thousand dollars and used social media to reinvigorate volunteers. A scrupulous check of facts was essential. We needed to be scrupulous when we published claims about the council budget. Careless or vile statements appeared online. At times critics used vile language to attack volunteers. That vile rhetoric damaged trust and made calm debate harder. If we ignore evidence and fail to learn, we risk regress. Poor planning can cause communities to regress to old, inefficient practices. Education is a better tool. Education and new technologies together can reinvigorate civic debate. I also believe that insisting on scrupulous standards of proof protects discussion from becoming toxic. Some people say action is pointless, or that protest only provokes violence. I think that stance misunderstands the purpose. A thoughtful citizen should avoid the futility of cynicism and try to improve matters.
📝 📚 IELTS Practice Questions
1
When did the speaker join the local campaign to save the library?
Wrong Answer
Correct Answer:
B
Explanation:
The passage states 'Three years ago I joined a local campaign ...'. Option B is correct. 'Last month', 'In 2010', and 'Ten years ago' are not mentioned and conflict with the stated timeframe.
2
How much money did the campaign raise, according to the speaker?
Wrong Answer
Correct Answer:
A
Explanation:
The speaker says 'we raised two thousand dollars'. The other amounts are plausible distractors but do not match the detail given in the passage.
3
Which two things does the speaker mention together as able to reinvigorate civic debate?
Wrong Answer
Correct Answer:
A
Explanation:
The passage says 'Education and new technologies together can reinvigorate civic debate.' Options B, C, and D are not presented as the combined solution in the text and therefore are incorrect.
4
What is the speaker's attitude toward protest and community action?
Wrong Answer
Correct Answer:
B
Explanation:
The speaker disagrees with claims of futility and argues that 'Protest and community work can reinvigorate interest in public life.' Thus option B is correct. Options A, C, and D contradict the speaker's view expressed in the passage.
5
In this context, what does the word 'scrupulous' most nearly mean?
Wrong Answer
Correct Answer:
B
Explanation:
The speaker refers to 'a scrupulous check of facts' and 'scrupulous standards of proof', implying careful and thorough attention. 'Careless', 'quick and superficial', and 'indifferent' are opposites of that meaning.
6
Why does the speaker mention 'vile' language and rhetoric?
Wrong Answer
Correct Answer:
B
Explanation:
The passage states 'That vile rhetoric damaged trust and made calm debate harder.' So the speaker mentions it because it harmed discussion. Options A and D are the opposite of the speaker's negative view, and option C contradicts the passage which explicitly says such statements appeared.
7
What does the speaker warn might happen if people ignore evidence and fail to learn?
Wrong Answer
Correct Answer:
C
Explanation:
The speaker warns 'If we ignore evidence and fail to learn, we risk regress' and later mentions communities regressing to old, inefficient practices. Options A, B, and D describe positive outcomes not supported by the passage.
Turn Listening into Speaking
Get instant feedback and daily practice in the LexiTalk app.
Download the App