Pasada 1
Escucha a ciegas
Comprende la idea general, el tema y la información principal sin subtítulos.
🎧 Práctica IELTS escucha y habla
0:00 / 0:00
Método de escucha en cinco pasadas
Convierte un contenido de escucha en input de inglés reutilizable
No te quedes en una sola reproducción. Divide el mismo episodio en cinco pasadas: primero la idea general, luego apoyo lingüístico, shadowing, dictado y una última escucha sin subtítulos.
Pasada 2
Subtítulos en inglés
Aclara palabras desconocidas y frases difíciles. Usa diccionario y notas breves si hace falta.
Pasada 3
Shadowing
Repite línea por línea e imita pronunciación, ritmo, acento y entonación.
Pasada 4
Dictado
Escribe algunas frases clave de lo que oyes para entrenar forma y estructura.
Pasada 5
Reescucha sin subtítulos
Escucha otra vez sin apoyo textual y observa qué ahora resulta más claro.
Después del entrenamiento
Compartir y reformular
Comparte notas, palabras nuevas o una idea útil, y luego vuelve a contar el episodio con tus propias palabras.
Siguiente paso
De escucha intensiva a extensiva
Reutiliza episodios estudiados a fondo como escucha de fondo y aumenta el volumen con material familiar.
Pasada 1Pasada 2Pasada 3Pasada 4Pasada 5
📝 Transcripción diálogo IELTS Speaking
I want to talk about criticism in public life. Good criticism can sharpen thinking. It can reveal weak points and suggest better ideas. But lately, online responses often do the opposite. Too frequently people rush to eviscerate an argument with a single harsh reply. That means they strip away nuance and leave nothing constructive. I have even seen commentators eviscerate a person’s reputation rather than address the idea. A recent, widely quoted survey claimed 60% of respondents said they prefer blunt feedback. And last year, a headline argued that 500 thought leaders were effectively deplatformed on one network. Those figures make the point, but they also distract from the real issue. The main problem is not numbers. It is tone. The best critics take time. They explain specific flaws. They offer alternatives and invite dialogue. Think of a teacher correcting a draft calmly, compared with a mob piling on in replies. To improve public debate we should pause before replying. We should ask clarifying questions. Schools could teach digital civility as part of citizenship classes. If we slow down, we may avoid needlessly trying to eviscerate every opposing view.
📝 📚 Preguntas de práctica IELTS
1
What main concern does the speaker express about online criticism?
Respuesta Incorrecta
Respuesta Correcta:
A
Explicación:
Correct: The speaker repeatedly says online criticism 'eviscerates' arguments and reputations instead of being constructive. Option B is incorrect because although the speaker mentions statistics, they say numbers distract from the issue, not that statistics are the main concern. Option C is wrong; the speaker criticizes quick, rushed responses, not slowness. Option D is incorrect because the speaker complains about harsh criticism, not excessive praise.
2
Which statistic did the speaker mention from a recent survey?
Respuesta Incorrecta
Respuesta Correcta:
B
Explicación:
Correct: The passage states 'a recent, widely quoted survey claimed 60% of respondents said they prefer blunt feedback.' Option A, C, and D are plausible-sounding distractors but are not mentioned in the passage.
3
Which example does the speaker use to contrast helpful and harmful criticism?
Respuesta Incorrecta
Respuesta Correcta:
A
Explicación:
Correct: The speaker explicitly contrasts 'a teacher correcting a draft calmly' with 'a mob piling on in replies.' Options B, C, and D are related ideas but are not the example used in the passage.
4
Why does the speaker suggest pausing before replying online?
Respuesta Incorrecta
Respuesta Correcta:
A
Explicación:
Correct: The speaker recommends pausing so people do not 'needlessly try to eviscerate every opposing view.' Option B is incorrect; there is no mention of deferring to news outlets. Option C is opposite to the speaker's aims—going viral is not a goal discussed. Option D is not supported; the speaker focuses on tone and quality, not comment counts.
5
In this context, what is the best meaning of the word 'eviscerate' as used by the speaker?
Respuesta Incorrecta
Respuesta Correcta:
C
Explicación:
Correct: 'Eviscerate' is used to describe stripping away nuance or gutting an argument or reputation, meaning to destroy or remove essential parts. Option A is incorrect because it is the opposite. Option B is wrong; 'eviscerate' implies active attack, not ignoring. Option D is incorrect because careful editing is constructive, whereas 'eviscerate' is destructive in this usage.
6
What does the speaker imply about the 'best critics'?
Respuesta Incorrecta
Respuesta Correcta:
A
Explicación:
Correct: The speaker says 'The best critics take time. They explain specific flaws. They offer alternatives and invite dialogue.' Option B is unsupported; length of commentary is not mentioned. Option C is wrong because the speaker criticizes blunt feedback when it is destructive. Option D is incorrect; the speaker does not claim critics should avoid statistics.
7
Which institution does the speaker suggest could help improve public debate?
Respuesta Incorrecta
Respuesta Correcta:
A
Explicación:
Correct: The speaker explicitly says 'Schools could teach digital civility as part of citizenship classes.' Options B, C, and D are plausible-sounding but are not suggested in the passage.
Convertir la Escucha en Habla
Obtén retroalimentación instantánea y práctica diaria en la app LexiTalk.
Descargar la App