第一遍
無字幕盲聽
先抓大意，確認主題、人物關係與主要資訊。
🎧 雅思聽力口語練習
0:00 / 0:00
五遍聽力法
把一段聽力內容練成可重複利用的英語輸入
不要只聽完就結束。把同一條內容拆成 5 遍，先抓大意，再解決語言點，再模仿、聽寫、複聽，最後把內容變成自己的表達。
第二遍
看英文字幕
解決生詞和難句，可以查字典、做簡短筆記。
第三遍
跟讀 shadowing
逐句模仿語音語調、節奏與重音，盡量貼近原聲。
第四遍
少量聽寫
挑幾句關鍵句做聽寫，訓練從聲音到句子的組織能力。
第五遍
無字幕複聽
查漏補缺，回到純聽，感受英語聲音和節奏。
訓練後動作 1
分享與複述
分享你的筆記、新詞或概念，並用自己的話複述內容，促進資訊重組與輸出。
訓練後動作 2
精聽轉泛聽
精聽過的材料後續可轉成泛聽。比如精聽 10 期後，把舊材料當成日常泛聽輸入。
第一遍第二遍第三遍第四遍第五遍
📝 雅思口語對話文本
Many people talk about the futility of small actions. Three years ago I joined a local campaign to save a small library, and some neighbours called that effort proof of futility. I do not share that view. Protest and community work can reinvigorate interest in public life. In that campaign we raised two thousand dollars and used social media to reinvigorate volunteers. A scrupulous check of facts was essential. We needed to be scrupulous when we published claims about the council budget. Careless or vile statements appeared online. At times critics used vile language to attack volunteers. That vile rhetoric damaged trust and made calm debate harder. If we ignore evidence and fail to learn, we risk regress. Poor planning can cause communities to regress to old, inefficient practices. Education is a better tool. Education and new technologies together can reinvigorate civic debate. I also believe that insisting on scrupulous standards of proof protects discussion from becoming toxic. Some people say action is pointless, or that protest only provokes violence. I think that stance misunderstands the purpose. A thoughtful citizen should avoid the futility of cynicism and try to improve matters.
📝 📚 雅思練習題
1
When did the speaker join the local campaign to save the library?
答案錯誤
正確答案:
B
解釋:
The passage states 'Three years ago I joined a local campaign ...'. Option B is correct. 'Last month', 'In 2010', and 'Ten years ago' are not mentioned and conflict with the stated timeframe.
2
How much money did the campaign raise, according to the speaker?
答案錯誤
正確答案:
A
解釋:
The speaker says 'we raised two thousand dollars'. The other amounts are plausible distractors but do not match the detail given in the passage.
3
Which two things does the speaker mention together as able to reinvigorate civic debate?
答案錯誤
正確答案:
A
解釋:
The passage says 'Education and new technologies together can reinvigorate civic debate.' Options B, C, and D are not presented as the combined solution in the text and therefore are incorrect.
4
What is the speaker's attitude toward protest and community action?
答案錯誤
正確答案:
B
解釋:
The speaker disagrees with claims of futility and argues that 'Protest and community work can reinvigorate interest in public life.' Thus option B is correct. Options A, C, and D contradict the speaker's view expressed in the passage.
5
In this context, what does the word 'scrupulous' most nearly mean?
答案錯誤
正確答案:
B
解釋:
The speaker refers to 'a scrupulous check of facts' and 'scrupulous standards of proof', implying careful and thorough attention. 'Careless', 'quick and superficial', and 'indifferent' are opposites of that meaning.
6
Why does the speaker mention 'vile' language and rhetoric?
答案錯誤
正確答案:
B
解釋:
The passage states 'That vile rhetoric damaged trust and made calm debate harder.' So the speaker mentions it because it harmed discussion. Options A and D are the opposite of the speaker's negative view, and option C contradicts the passage which explicitly says such statements appeared.
7
What does the speaker warn might happen if people ignore evidence and fail to learn?
答案錯誤
正確答案:
C
解釋:
The speaker warns 'If we ignore evidence and fail to learn, we risk regress' and later mentions communities regressing to old, inefficient practices. Options A, B, and D describe positive outcomes not supported by the passage.
將聽力轉化為口語
在LexiTalk應用中獲得即時反饋和每日練習。
下載應用