Passagem 1
Escuta às cegas
Entenda a ideia geral, o tema e as informações principais sem legendas.
🎧 Prática IELTS escuta e fala
0:00 / 0:00
Método de escuta em cinco passagens
Transforme um conteudo de escuta em input de inglês reutilizável
Não pare em uma única reprodução. Divida o mesmo episódio em cinco passagens: primeiro a ideia geral, depois apoio linguístico, shadowing, ditado e uma escuta final sem legendas.
Passagem 2
Legendas em inglês
Resolva palavras desconhecidas e frases difíceis. Use dicionário e notas curtas se necessário.
Passagem 3
Shadowing
Repita linha por linha e imite pronúncia, ritmo, acentuação e entonação.
Passagem 4
Ditado
Escreva algumas frases-chave a partir do que você ouve para treinar forma e estrutura.
Passagem 5
Reescuta sem legendas
Ouça novamente sem apoio de texto e perceba o que agora está mais fácil e claro.
Após o treino
Compartilhar e recontar
Compartilhe anotações, palavras novas ou um conceito útil e depois reconte o episódio com suas próprias palavras.
Próximo passo
Do intensivo ao extensivo
Reaproveite episódios estudados intensivamente como escuta de fundo e aumente o volume com material familiar.
Passagem 1Passagem 2Passagem 3Passagem 4Passagem 5
📝 Transcrição diálogo IELTS Speaking
I want to talk about criticism in public life. Good criticism can sharpen thinking. It can reveal weak points and suggest better ideas. But lately, online responses often do the opposite. Too frequently people rush to eviscerate an argument with a single harsh reply. That means they strip away nuance and leave nothing constructive. I have even seen commentators eviscerate a person’s reputation rather than address the idea. A recent, widely quoted survey claimed 60% of respondents said they prefer blunt feedback. And last year, a headline argued that 500 thought leaders were effectively deplatformed on one network. Those figures make the point, but they also distract from the real issue. The main problem is not numbers. It is tone. The best critics take time. They explain specific flaws. They offer alternatives and invite dialogue. Think of a teacher correcting a draft calmly, compared with a mob piling on in replies. To improve public debate we should pause before replying. We should ask clarifying questions. Schools could teach digital civility as part of citizenship classes. If we slow down, we may avoid needlessly trying to eviscerate every opposing view.
📝 📚 Perguntas de prática IELTS
1
What main concern does the speaker express about online criticism?
Resposta Incorreta
Resposta Correta:
A
Explicação:
Correct: The speaker repeatedly says online criticism 'eviscerates' arguments and reputations instead of being constructive. Option B is incorrect because although the speaker mentions statistics, they say numbers distract from the issue, not that statistics are the main concern. Option C is wrong; the speaker criticizes quick, rushed responses, not slowness. Option D is incorrect because the speaker complains about harsh criticism, not excessive praise.
2
Which statistic did the speaker mention from a recent survey?
Resposta Incorreta
Resposta Correta:
B
Explicação:
Correct: The passage states 'a recent, widely quoted survey claimed 60% of respondents said they prefer blunt feedback.' Option A, C, and D are plausible-sounding distractors but are not mentioned in the passage.
3
Which example does the speaker use to contrast helpful and harmful criticism?
Resposta Incorreta
Resposta Correta:
A
Explicação:
Correct: The speaker explicitly contrasts 'a teacher correcting a draft calmly' with 'a mob piling on in replies.' Options B, C, and D are related ideas but are not the example used in the passage.
4
Why does the speaker suggest pausing before replying online?
Resposta Incorreta
Resposta Correta:
A
Explicação:
Correct: The speaker recommends pausing so people do not 'needlessly try to eviscerate every opposing view.' Option B is incorrect; there is no mention of deferring to news outlets. Option C is opposite to the speaker's aims—going viral is not a goal discussed. Option D is not supported; the speaker focuses on tone and quality, not comment counts.
5
In this context, what is the best meaning of the word 'eviscerate' as used by the speaker?
Resposta Incorreta
Resposta Correta:
C
Explicação:
Correct: 'Eviscerate' is used to describe stripping away nuance or gutting an argument or reputation, meaning to destroy or remove essential parts. Option A is incorrect because it is the opposite. Option B is wrong; 'eviscerate' implies active attack, not ignoring. Option D is incorrect because careful editing is constructive, whereas 'eviscerate' is destructive in this usage.
6
What does the speaker imply about the 'best critics'?
Resposta Incorreta
Resposta Correta:
A
Explicação:
Correct: The speaker says 'The best critics take time. They explain specific flaws. They offer alternatives and invite dialogue.' Option B is unsupported; length of commentary is not mentioned. Option C is wrong because the speaker criticizes blunt feedback when it is destructive. Option D is incorrect; the speaker does not claim critics should avoid statistics.
7
Which institution does the speaker suggest could help improve public debate?
Resposta Incorreta
Resposta Correta:
A
Explicação:
Correct: The speaker explicitly says 'Schools could teach digital civility as part of citizenship classes.' Options B, C, and D are plausible-sounding but are not suggested in the passage.
Transformar Escuta em Fala
Obtenha feedback instantâneo e prática diária no app LexiTalk.
Baixar o App