Passe 1
Écoute à l’aveugle
Comprenez l’idée générale, le thème et les informations principales sans sous-titres.
🎧 Pratique IELTS écoute et expression
0:00 / 0:00
Méthode d’écoute en cinq passes
Transformer un contenu d’écoute en input d’anglais réutilisable
Ne vous arrêtez pas à une seule écoute. Découpez le même épisode en cinq passes : idée générale, aide linguistique, shadowing, dictée, puis une dernière écoute sans sous-titres.
Passe 2
Sous-titres anglais
Clarifiez les mots inconnus et les phrases difficiles. Utilisez un dictionnaire et de courtes notes si besoin.
Passe 3
Shadowing
Répétez phrase par phrase et imitez la prononciation, le rythme, l’accentuation et l’intonation.
Passe 4
Dictée
Écrivez quelques phrases clés à partir de ce que vous entendez pour travailler la forme et la structure.
Passe 5
Réécoute sans sous-titres
Réécoutez sans support textuel et observez ce qui est maintenant plus simple et plus clair.
Après l’entraînement
Partager et reformuler
Partagez vos notes, de nouveaux mots ou une idée utile, puis racontez l’épisode avec vos propres mots.
Étape suivante
De l’intensif à l’extensif
Réutilisez les épisodes étudiés en profondeur comme écoute de fond et augmentez votre volume avec du contenu familier.
Passe 1Passe 2Passe 3Passe 4Passe 5
📝 Transcription dialogue IELTS Speaking
Many people talk about the futility of small actions. Three years ago I joined a local campaign to save a small library, and some neighbours called that effort proof of futility. I do not share that view. Protest and community work can reinvigorate interest in public life. In that campaign we raised two thousand dollars and used social media to reinvigorate volunteers. A scrupulous check of facts was essential. We needed to be scrupulous when we published claims about the council budget. Careless or vile statements appeared online. At times critics used vile language to attack volunteers. That vile rhetoric damaged trust and made calm debate harder. If we ignore evidence and fail to learn, we risk regress. Poor planning can cause communities to regress to old, inefficient practices. Education is a better tool. Education and new technologies together can reinvigorate civic debate. I also believe that insisting on scrupulous standards of proof protects discussion from becoming toxic. Some people say action is pointless, or that protest only provokes violence. I think that stance misunderstands the purpose. A thoughtful citizen should avoid the futility of cynicism and try to improve matters.
📝 📚 Questions de pratique IELTS
1
When did the speaker join the local campaign to save the library?
Réponse incorrecte
Réponse correcte:
B
Explication:
The passage states 'Three years ago I joined a local campaign ...'. Option B is correct. 'Last month', 'In 2010', and 'Ten years ago' are not mentioned and conflict with the stated timeframe.
2
How much money did the campaign raise, according to the speaker?
Réponse incorrecte
Réponse correcte:
A
Explication:
The speaker says 'we raised two thousand dollars'. The other amounts are plausible distractors but do not match the detail given in the passage.
3
Which two things does the speaker mention together as able to reinvigorate civic debate?
Réponse incorrecte
Réponse correcte:
A
Explication:
The passage says 'Education and new technologies together can reinvigorate civic debate.' Options B, C, and D are not presented as the combined solution in the text and therefore are incorrect.
4
What is the speaker's attitude toward protest and community action?
Réponse incorrecte
Réponse correcte:
B
Explication:
The speaker disagrees with claims of futility and argues that 'Protest and community work can reinvigorate interest in public life.' Thus option B is correct. Options A, C, and D contradict the speaker's view expressed in the passage.
5
In this context, what does the word 'scrupulous' most nearly mean?
Réponse incorrecte
Réponse correcte:
B
Explication:
The speaker refers to 'a scrupulous check of facts' and 'scrupulous standards of proof', implying careful and thorough attention. 'Careless', 'quick and superficial', and 'indifferent' are opposites of that meaning.
6
Why does the speaker mention 'vile' language and rhetoric?
Réponse incorrecte
Réponse correcte:
B
Explication:
The passage states 'That vile rhetoric damaged trust and made calm debate harder.' So the speaker mentions it because it harmed discussion. Options A and D are the opposite of the speaker's negative view, and option C contradicts the passage which explicitly says such statements appeared.
7
What does the speaker warn might happen if people ignore evidence and fail to learn?
Réponse incorrecte
Réponse correcte:
C
Explication:
The speaker warns 'If we ignore evidence and fail to learn, we risk regress' and later mentions communities regressing to old, inefficient practices. Options A, B, and D describe positive outcomes not supported by the passage.
Transformer l'Écoute en Parole
Obtenez des commentaires instantanés et une pratique quotidienne dans l'app LexiTalk.
Télécharger l'App