Passe 1
Écoute à l’aveugle
Comprenez l’idée générale, le thème et les informations principales sans sous-titres.
🎧 Pratique IELTS écoute et expression
0:00 / 0:00
Méthode d’écoute en cinq passes
Transformer un contenu d’écoute en input d’anglais réutilisable
Ne vous arrêtez pas à une seule écoute. Découpez le même épisode en cinq passes : idée générale, aide linguistique, shadowing, dictée, puis une dernière écoute sans sous-titres.
Passe 2
Sous-titres anglais
Clarifiez les mots inconnus et les phrases difficiles. Utilisez un dictionnaire et de courtes notes si besoin.
Passe 3
Shadowing
Répétez phrase par phrase et imitez la prononciation, le rythme, l’accentuation et l’intonation.
Passe 4
Dictée
Écrivez quelques phrases clés à partir de ce que vous entendez pour travailler la forme et la structure.
Passe 5
Réécoute sans sous-titres
Réécoutez sans support textuel et observez ce qui est maintenant plus simple et plus clair.
Après l’entraînement
Partager et reformuler
Partagez vos notes, de nouveaux mots ou une idée utile, puis racontez l’épisode avec vos propres mots.
Étape suivante
De l’intensif à l’extensif
Réutilisez les épisodes étudiés en profondeur comme écoute de fond et augmentez votre volume avec du contenu familier.
Passe 1Passe 2Passe 3Passe 4Passe 5
📝 Transcription dialogue IELTS Speaking
I want to talk about poise in public life. Poise keeps you steady when criticism arrives. Last year I moderated a panel and there was a sudden frenzy in the audience. The frenzy began after an accusation about one speaker. I was only 22 when it happened, which surprised some people. The room held about 300 attendees and two judges on the stage. The committee had introduced draconian regulations for the event. Those draconian rules restricted how we responded. A tiny freckle on my colleague's cheek was mistaken for an ink mark during the uproar. That same freckle was mentioned repeatedly in online posts. We tried to vindicate his reputation with emails and statements. Only clear evidence could vindicate him fully in the eyes of the public. I believe poise helped me manage the situation calmly. I resisted the immediate urge to escalate. The frenzy online made that hard. I think strict policies that are draconian often backfire. In this case, the rules amplified the problem instead of solving it. My aim was to restore trust and avoid a spectacle. In the end we provided documents and witnesses. That approach reduced the frenzy and helped vindicate my friend. Small details such as a freckle should never determine guilt.
📝 📚 Questions de pratique IELTS
1
What quality does the speaker emphasise as important in public situations?
Réponse incorrecte
Réponse correcte:
A
Explication:
The speaker explicitly states 'I want to talk about poise' and repeats that 'Poise keeps you steady' and 'I believe poise helped me manage the situation.' Options B, C and D are not mentioned and are irrelevant to the speaker's emphasis.
2
What small physical mark was mistaken for an ink mark during the uproar?
Réponse incorrecte
Réponse correcte:
A
Explication:
The passage states 'A tiny freckle on my colleague's cheek was mistaken for an ink mark.' The other options are plausible-sounding distractors but are not mentioned in the text.
3
What kind of measures did the committee introduce for the event?
Réponse incorrecte
Réponse correcte:
A
Explication:
The speaker says 'The committee had introduced draconian regulations' and later refers to 'Those draconian rules.' The other choices contradict the description in the passage.
4
Approximately how many people attended the event, according to the speaker?
Réponse incorrecte
Réponse correcte:
B
Explication:
The speaker gives the detail 'The room held about 300 attendees.' The other numbers are not supported by the passage and are included as plausible but incorrect distractors.
5
Why was vindicating the colleague difficult, as implied by the speaker?
Réponse incorrecte
Réponse correcte:
A
Explication:
The speaker says 'Only clear evidence could vindicate him fully,' implying a lack of clear evidence made vindication difficult. Options B, C and D are not supported by the passage and contradict the described circumstances.
6
What is the speaker's attitude toward strict, draconian policies?
Réponse incorrecte
Réponse correcte:
A
Explication:
The speaker explicitly states 'I think strict policies that are draconian often backfire' and gives an example of rules amplifying the problem. Options B, C and D contradict this view or are inaccurate.
7
As used in the passage, what does 'vindicate' most nearly mean?
Réponse incorrecte
Réponse correcte:
A
Explication:
The speaker uses 'vindicate' in the context of restoring a reputation with evidence: 'Only clear evidence could vindicate him fully.' This means to clear from blame or justify. The other options misrepresent the meaning: vindicate does not mean punish, automatically forgive, or ignore.
Transformer l'Écoute en Parole
Obtenez des commentaires instantanés et une pratique quotidienne dans l'app LexiTalk.
Télécharger l'App